HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Phillip P. Brown Michael J. Mack Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brown, P. P. Articles by Becker, E. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brown, P. P. Articles by Becker, E. R. Related Collections Minimally invasive surgery

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:S1009-S1015
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Supplement: Cardiothoracic techniques and technologies

Comparing clinical outcomes in high-volume and low-volume off-pump coronary bypass operation programs

^a HCA—The Healthcare Company, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
^b Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
^c Cardiac Data Solutions, Inc, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Becker, Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30322
e-mail: ebeck01{at}sph.emory.edu

Presented at the Seventh Annual Cardiothoracic Techniques and Technologies Meeting 2001, New Orleans, LA, Jan 24–27, 2001.

Background. A growing body of data suggests that physicians or medical centers performing a higher volume of patient services achieve better outcomes. We hypothesized that an important dimension of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) volume is the cardiovascular surgical team experience with performing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) procedures, as well as the team’s ability to provide the optimal approach for the patient’s clinical condition. Teams performing 100 or more OPCAB operations have improved clinical decision-making processes and technical skills regarding treatment of all CABG patients, regardless of whether cardiopulmonary bypass is used. We hypothesized that this experience and choice of approaches for CABG procedures translates into better clinical outcomes.

Methods. Using data on 16,988 consecutive patients in 72 hospitals from the HCA—The Healthcare Company casemix database, we identified high- and low-volume OPCAB sites and then analyzed the patient and hospital characteristics that had an impact on clinical outcomes.

Results. The mortality rates for the high- and low-volume OPCAB facilities both averaged 2.9% (p = NS). Patients at the high-volume OPCAB facilities had significantly lower rates of major complications (shock/hemorrhage, neurologic, renal, and cardiac) than those at the low-volume OPCAB facilities. Of the seven minor complications, rates for six were lower in the high-volume OPCAB facilities, but none of the differences reached statistical significance. High-volume OPCAB sites were significantly more likely to discharge their patients directly home than were low-volume OPCAB sites (80% versus 66%; p = 0.001).

Conclusions. The results suggested that surgical team experience and choice of approaches to performing CABG had an impact on patient outcomes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Mukherjee, H. A Zaidi, T. Kosztowski, K. L Chaichana, R. Salvatori, D. C Chang, and A. Quinones-Hinojosa Predictors of access to pituitary tumor resection in the United States, 1988-2005 Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2009; 161(2): 259 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. H. Konety, G. E. Rosenthal, and M. S. Vaughan-Sarrazin Surgical volume and outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Does it matter? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2009; 137(5): 1116 - 23.e1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. G. Glance, A. W. Dick, T. M. Osler, and D. B. Mukamel The Relation Between Surgeon Volume and Outcome Following Off-Pump vs On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 829 - 837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J Murphy, R. Ascione, and G. D Angelini Coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart: surgical revascularization for the next decade? Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2004; 25(23): 2077 - 2085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G J Murphy and G D Angelini Coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart: changing the paradigm J R Soc Med, July 1, 2004; 97(7): 313 - 316. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. deGuzman, M. H. Subramaniam, T. M. Dewey, M. J. Magee, M. J. Mack, N. D. Desai, S. E. Fremes, R. Svedjeholm, L.-G. Dahlin, N. E. Khan, et al. Off-Pump versus On-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery N. Engl. J. Med., April 22, 2004; 350(17): 1791 - 1793. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Athanasiou, S. Al-Ruzzeh, R. D. Stanbridge, R. P. Casula, B. E. Glenville, and M. Amrani Is the female gender an independent predictor of adverse outcome after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting? Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 75(4): 1153 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. P. Brown, M. J. Mack, A. W. Simon, S. Battaglia, L. Tarkington, S. Horner, S. D. Culler, and E. R. Becker Outcomes experience with off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in women Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 2113 - 2119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]