ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Paul A. Kurlansky
Ernest A. Traad
David L. Galbut
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurlansky, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ebra, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurlansky, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ebra, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:1949-1958
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Efficacy of single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in women: a long-term study

Paul A. Kurlansky, MDa, Ernest A. Traad, MDa, David L. Galbut, MDa, Melinda Zucker, BSNa, George Ebra, EdDa

a Miami Heart Research Institute, Miami Beach, Florida, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Kurlansky, Miami Heart Research Institute, 801 Arthur Godfrey Rd, 5 Fl, Miami Beach, FL 33140

Presented at the Forty-seventh Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Marco Island, FL, Nov 9–11, 2000.

Background. Coronary artery bypass grafting carries a higher operative mortality and less favorable long-term benefit in women than in men. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting (BIMA) has been shown to yield excellent perioperative and long-term results in both women and men. However, controversy continues to exist as to the benefits of a second internal mammary artery graft in women.

Methods. A retrospective analysis was performed comparing 261 consecutive women from a single surgical practice receiving BIMA and supplemental vein grafts between January 1972 and October 1994 with a computer-matched cohort of 261 women receiving single internal mammary artery (SIMA) and vein grafts during the same period. Univariate analysis confirmed the homogeneity of the two groups based on nine preoperative variables.

Results. Operative mortality was comparable in the two groups, 3.8% (10 of 261 patients) in the SIMA and 3.4% (9 of 261 patients) in the BIMA group, with a markedly reduced mortality in both groups since 1990, 2.3% (2 of 86 patients) in the SIMA and 1.3% (1 of 78 patients) in the BIMA group. The mean number of distal grafts (2.78, SIMA; 3.14, BIMA), perfusion time (104 minutes, SIMA; 108 minutes, BIMA), and cross-clamp time (58 minutes, SIMA; 66 minutes, BIMA) were all comparable. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications, including sternal wound infection. Patient follow-up ranged from 1 month to 27 years, with a mean of 10.0 years in the SIMA group and 9.1 years in the BIMA group. Clinical results were excellent, with 100% (136 of 136 patients) of the SIMA and 100% (167 of 167 patients) of the BIMA patients in Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I or II at follow-up. Rates of late myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and reoperation were similarly low in both groups: 3.7% (5 of 136 patients) versus 1.8% (3 of 166 patients), 5.4% (7 of 136 patients) versus 4.8% (8 of 166 patients), and 3.7% (5 of 136 patients) versus 1.8% (3 of 166 patients), for SIMA versus BIMA survivors, respectively. No significant difference was found in the long-term and event-free survival or in any of the eight subscales of the SF-36 quality of life survey for the two groups.

Conclusions. Excellent short- and long-term results have been demonstrated with internal mammary artery grafting in women. However, the addition of a second internal mammary artery graft does not appear to confer any additional clinical benefits in a comparably matched cohort of patients.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. S. Lawton, S. J. Brister, K. R. Petro, and M. Dullum
Surgical revascularization in women: unique intraoperative factors and considerations
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2003; 126(4): 936 - 938.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
C. Muneretto, A. Negri, J. Manfredi, A. Terrini, G. Rodella, S. ElQarra, and G. Bisleri
Safety and usefulness of composite grafts for total arterial myocardial revascularization: A prospective randomized evaluation
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2003; 125(4): 826 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
Y. J. Woo and T. J. Gardner
Myocardial Revascularization with Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 581 - 607.
[Full Text]


Home page
HeartHome page
D P Taggart
Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: are BIMA better?
Heart, July 1, 2002; 88(1): 7 - 9.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Al-Ruzzeh, S. George, M. Bustami, K. Nakamura, C. Ilsley, and M. Amrani
Early clinical and angiographic outcome of the pedicled right internal thoracic artery graft to the left anterior descending artery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 73(5): 1431 - 1435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. W. Lytle and F. D. Loop
Superiority of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting: It's Been a Long Time Comin'
Circulation, October 30, 2001; 104(18): 2152 - 2154.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.