ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ryo Aeba
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kashima, I.
Right arrow Articles by Kawada, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kashima, I.
Right arrow Articles by Kawada, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology - arrhythmias

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:1945-1948
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Optimal position of atrial epicardial leads for temporary pacing in infants after cardiac surgery

Ichiro Kashima, MDa, Ryo Aeba, MDa, Toshiyuki Katogi, MDa, Shiaki Kawada, MDa

a Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan

Accepted for publication March 13, 2001.

Address reprint requests to Dr Kashima, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
e-mail: kashima{at}chp.kiyose.tokyo.jp

Background. The atrial epicardial wall of pediatric patients was topographically assessed to identify the optimal position for temporary atrial pacing.

Methods. Unipolar electrodes were fixed at the cephalic wall between the right and left atrial appendages, the interatrial groove, and the right atrial appendage of fifteen pediatric patients who underwent definitive surgical repair. The performance of the three electrodes in terms of pacing patterns and six combinations of bipolar pacing were evaluated in terms of the pacing threshold, P-wave amplitude, slew rate, and lead impedance.

Results. Unipolar pacing of the right atrial appendage showed a significantly higher threshold than the other groups. A bipolar configuration of the cephalic atrial wall and interatrial groove had a significantly higher P-wave amplitude than groups without the electrode at the cephalic atrial wall, and a significantly higher slew rate than a unipolar configuration of the atrial appendage.

Conclusions. Bipolar pacing with the negative electrode at the cephalic atrial wall and the indifferent electrode at the interatrial groove is the most efficient method for pediatric patients.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.