ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turrentine, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turrentine, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:S356-S360
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Autografts, allografts, and biological valves in children

Biological versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in children

Mark W. Turrentine, MDa, Mark Ruzmetov, MDa, Palaniswamy Vijay, PhDa, Randall G. Bills, PCTCa, John W. Brown, MDa

a Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, James W. Riley Hospital for Children, and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Turrentine, Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Dr, EH 215, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5123
e-mail: mturren{at}iupui.edu

Presented at the VIII International Symposium on Cardiac Bioprostheses, Cancun, Mexico, Nov 3–5, 2000.

Background. Aortic valve replacement in children remains challenging because of constraints imposed by available prosthetic devices. Potential risks of anticoagulation with mechanical valves and degeneration of other biological substitutes have kindled interest in the Ross procedure. This study outlines the evolution of our 27-year experience with prosthetic devices.

Methods. Ninety-nine patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (January 1973 through September 2000) were included in this study. Procedures included implantation of pulmonary autograft (PA) (n = 42), aortic homograft (AH) (n = 3), mechanical valves (MV) (n = 41), and xenograft tissue valves (XG) (n = 13).

Results. The mean follow-up times were: 3.8 ± 1.3 years for PA, 3.5 ± 1.5 years for AH, 7.7 ± 4.7 years for MV, and 8.4 ± 4.8 years for XG. There were no significant differences in perioperative outcomes among the groups (p <= 0.05) or early deaths (2 each in the MV, AH, and PA groups). The incidence of valve-related complications and reoperations was high in the MV (n = 5), XG (n = 7), and AH (n = 1) groups as compared with the PA group (n = 3, p < 0.01). Early and late mortality for the series was 8.6% (n = 8). Overall, the reoperation rate was 20.7% (n = 18): 15.2% (5 of 33) MV, 70% (7 of 10) XG, 50% (1 of 2) AH, and 11.9% (5 of 42) for PA. The actuarial survival rate was 87.8% and 100% at 10 years for MV and XG, and 95.2% and 6.6% at 7 years for PA and AH.

Conclusions. Aortic valve replacement in children can be performed with acceptable mortality and good long-term results. The Ross procedure, although more complicated, has the advantage of not requiring anticoagulation therapy, can be performed in all age groups, possesses inherent growth potential, and exhibits the most normal left ventricular outflow tract hemodynamics.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. K. Pasquali, D. Shera, G. Wernovsky, M. S. Cohen, S. Tabbutt, S. Nicolson, T. L. Spray, and B. S. Marino
Midterm outcomes and predictors of reintervention after the Ross procedure in infants, children, and young adults
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2007; 133(4): 893 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. R. Kanter, P. M. Kirshbom, and B. E. Kogon
Redo Aortic Valve Replacement in Children
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1594 - 1597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Doss, J. P. Wood, S. Martens, G. Wimmer-Greinecker, and A. Moritz
Do Pulmonary Autografts Provide Better Outcomes Than Mechanical Valves? A Prospective Randomized Trial
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 80(6): 2194 - 2198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
C. Rergkliang, V. Chittithavorn, A. Chetpaophan, and P. Vasinanukorn
Surgery for Aortic Insufficiency Associated with Ventricular Septal Defect
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2005; 13(1): 61 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Ruel, A. Kulik, B. K. Lam, F. D. Rubens, P. J. Hendry, R. G. Masters, P. Bedard, and T. G. Mesana
Long-term outcomes of valve replacement with modern prostheses in young adults
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 27(3): 425 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.