|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:811-815
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ko
uyolu Heart and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Accepted for publication October 14, 2000.
Address reprint requests to Dr Kirali, Ko
uyolu Heart and Research Hospital, 81020, Kadiköy, Istanbul, Turkey
e-mail: kosuyolu{at}superonline.com
Background. Bioprosthetic valve use represents a crucial improvement in surgical treatment of mitral valve disease. The aim of this study is to determine the long-term durability of the Biocor porcine bioprosthetic mitral valve.
Methods. Between 1985 and 1989, a total of 158 Biocor porcine bioprosthetic valves were placed in the mitral position, and long-term results of these patients were investigated retrospectively in 1999.
Results. Thirty-day mortality was 4.4% (7 patients). Total follow-up was 1,499 patient-years. Actuarial survival was 83.66% ± 3% at 5 years, 77.78% ± 3.36% at 13 years (1.8% patient-year). Multivariate analysis demonstrated younger age, duration of implantation, congestive heart failure, and functional class to be significant predictors of late mortality. Actuarial freedom from valve-related mortality was 98.58% ± 1% at 15 years (0.13% patient-year). Actuarial freedom from structural valve deterioration was 95.49% ± 1.8% at 5 years, 70.2% ± 4.12% at 10 years, and 64.82% ± 5.34% at 13 years (2.6% patient-year). Actuarial freedom from structural valve deterioration-related reoperation was 98.43% ± 1.1% at 5 years, 89.15% ± 2.85% at 10 years, and 76.82% ± 7.91% at 14 years. Multivariate analysis showed younger age and duration of implantation to be significant predictors of structural valve deterioration and its related reoperation.
Conclusions. By studying a 15-year time period, it is seen that this new generation porcine bioprosthetic valve should be considered an alternative for mechanical valves in selected patients.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Kabbani, H. Jamil, F. Nabhani, A. Hamoud, K. Katan, N. Sabbagh, A. Koudsi, L. Kabbani, and G. Hamed Analysis of 92 mitral pulmonary autograft replacement (Ross II) operations. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2007; 134(4): 902 - 908.e7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. De Santo, G. Romano, A. D. Corte, F. Tizzano, A. Petraio, C. Amarelli, M. De Feo, G. Dialetto, M. Scardone, and M. Cotrufo Mitral mechanical replacement in young rheumatic women: Analysis of long-term survival, valve-related complications, and pregnancy outcomes over a 3707-patient-year follow-up J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2005; 130(1): 13 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Rizzoli, T. Bottio, V. Vida, G. Nesseris, L. Caprili, G. Thiene, and G. Gerosa Intermediate results of isolated mitral valve replacement with a Biocor porcine valve J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2005; 129(2): 322 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |