HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Related Collections Lung - cancer Related Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:425-433
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original article: general thoracic

Investigating extrathoracic metastatic disease in patients with apparently operable lung cancer^*

^a Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
^b Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
^c University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
^d University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
^e McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
^f University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
^g University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Accepted for publication June 1, 2000.

Address reprint requests to Dr Guyatt, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Health Sciences Center, Room 2C12, 1200 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8N 3Z5
e-mail: guyatt{at}mcmaster.ca

Background. The optimal approach to the investigation of possible distant metastases in patients with apparently operable non–small cell lung cancer who do not have symptoms suggesting metastatic disease is controversial.

Methods. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial in thoracic surgery services at mainly academic tertiary- and secondary-care general hospitals. We recruited 634 patients with apparently operable, suspected or proven non–small cell carcinoma of the lung without findings on history, physical examination, laboratory testing, or imaging suggesting extrathoracic metastases. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either mediastinoscopy and computed tomography of the chest and then, depending on the results, immediate thoracotomy or bone scintigraphy and computed tomographic scanning of the head, liver, and adrenal glands.

Results. The relative risk of thoracotomy without cure (the combination of open and closed thoracotomy, incomplete resection, and thoracotomy with subsequent recurrence) in the full investigation group versus the limited investigation group was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 1.13; p = 0.20). Forty-three patients in the full investigation group and 61 patients in the limited investigation group underwent a thoracotomy but subsequently had recurrence (relative risk, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.03; p = 0.07). Patients in the full investigation group were more likely to have avoided thoracotomy because of extrathoracic metastatic disease than those in the limited investigation group (22 patients versus 10 patients, respectively; relative risk, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.04 to 4.59; p value = 0.04). The total number of negative invasive tests was six in the full investigation group and one in the limited investigation group (relative risk, 6.1; 95% CI, 0.72 to 51.0; p = 0.10) and the total number of invasive tests, 11 versus six, respectively (relative risk, 1.84; 95% CI, 0.68 to 4.98; p = 0.23). The full investigation strategy cost $823 less per patient (95% CIs 2,482 to -725).

Conclusions. Full investigation for metastatic disease in patients with non–small cell lung cancer without symptoms or signs of metastatic disease may reduce the number of thoracotomies without cure. The higher the threshold for considering symptoms to suggest metastatic disease, the more likely it is that investigation will spare patients futile thoracotomy.

Related Article

Invited commentary

Gerard A. Silvestri
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001 71: 433-434. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. E. Maziak, G. E. Darling, R. I. Inculet, K. Y. Gulenchyn, A. A. Driedger, Y. C. Ung, J. D. Miller, C.-S. Gu, K. J. Cline, W. K. Evans, et al. Positron Emission Tomography in Staging Early Lung Cancer: A Randomized Trial Ann Intern Med, August 18, 2009; 151(4): 221 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Silvestri, M. K. Gould, M. L. Margolis, L. T. Tanoue, D. McCrory, E. Toloza, and F. Detterbeck Noninvasive Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidenced-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition) Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 178S - 201S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Erturan, M. Yaman, G. Aydin, I. Uzel, B. Musellim, and K. Kaynak The Role of Whole-Body Bone Scanning and Clinical Factors in Detecting Bone Metastases in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Chest, February 1, 2005; 127(2): 449 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R Booton, M Jones, and N Thatcher Lung cancer * 7: Management of lung cancer in elderly patients Thorax, August 1, 2003; 58(8): 711 - 720. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Toloza, L. Harpole, and D. C. McCrory Noninvasive Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review of the Current Evidence Chest, January 1, 2003; 123 (2009): 137S - 146S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Spiro and J. C. Porter Lung Cancer--Where Are We Today?: Current Advances in Staging and Nonsurgical Treatment Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2002; 166(9): 1166 - 1196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]