HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): John D. Urschel Thomas A. Horan Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Urschel, J. D. Articles by Bennett, W. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Urschel, J. D. Articles by Bennett, W. F. Related Collections Education Related Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:337-339
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original article: general thoracic

Duration of knowledge in general thoracic surgery

^a Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Accepted for publication August 18, 2000.

Address reprint requests to Dr Urschel, St. Joseph’s Hospital, 50 Charlton Ave East, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 4A6, Canada
e-mail: urschelj{at}fhs.mcmaster.ca

Background. Medical knowledge changes rapidly, so current medical education approaches emphasize the development of life-long learning skills ("teaching the learner to learn") as opposed to the simple acquisition of contemporary medical knowledge. Because there are no data on the rapidity of change of general thoracic surgical knowledge, we do not know whether this trend in medical education is appropriate for thoracic surgical trainees. We undertook a study to assess the duration of knowledge in general thoracic surgery.

Methods. The first general thoracic surgery article from each issue of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery between 1965 and 1997 was abstracted into a summary statement. A form, made up of 360 summary statements in random order, was assessed by 6 general thoracic surgeons. They assessed statement validity on a 5-point scale (1 = statement false; 5 = statement true). Average statement validity scores for 30 time intervals were calculated. The relationship between time of publication and statement validity was analyzed.

Results. Average validity scores ranged from 2.24 (represents 1965 to 1966) to 4.32 (represents 1969 to 1970). Validity scores increased with time (y = 3.46 + 0.017x, where y is validity score and x is time), and this was significant (r = 0.40; p = 0.027). However, the absolute change in average validity scores over the 33-year study period was only 0.52 or 13.1% of the "modern" era scores.

Conclusions. The assumption that medical knowledge changes quickly may not be true in general thoracic surgery. Although life-long learning skills are important, general thoracic surgery training programs should continue to emphasize fundamental knowledge in the specialty.

Related Article

Invited commentary

Richard F. Heitmiller
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001 71: 339. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Gold, W. B. Begg, D. A. Fullerton, D. J. Mathisen, M. B. Orringer, and E. D. Verrier Evaluation of Web-Based Learning Tools: Lessons Learned from the Thoracic Surgery Directors Association Curriculum Project Three-Year Experience Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 802 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Gold, E. A. Verrier, G. N. Olinger, and M. B. Orringer Development of a CD-ROM internet hybrid: a new thoracic surgery curriculum Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2002; 74(5): 1741 - 1746. [Full Text] [PDF]