ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Claude Deschamps
Mark S. Allen
Daniel L. Miller
Victor F. Trastek
Peter C. Pairolero
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pairolero, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pairolero, P. C.

Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1799-1802
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: general thoracic

Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease: self-assessment of functional outcome and quality of life

Mary M. Young, MDa, Claude Deschamps, MDa, Mark S. Allen, MDa, Daniel L. Miller, MDa, Victor F. Trastek, MDa, Cathy D. Schleck, BSb, Peter C. Pairolero, MDa

a Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
b Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Deschamps, Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, 200 First St, SW, Rochester, MN 55905
e-mail: deschamps.claude{at}mayo.edu

Presented at the Thirty-sixth Annual Meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Jan 31–Feb 2, 2000.

Background. Little information exists regarding functional outcome and quality of life after esophagectomy and subsequent esophageal reconstruction for benign disease as evaluated by the patients themselves.

Methods. Eighty-one patients completed a combined two-part questionnaire regarding esophageal function and quality of life (MOS SF-36) a median of 9.8 years (range, 10 months to 18.9 years) after esophageal reconstruction for benign disease. There were 43 men (53.1%) and 38 women (46.9%). Median age at time of esophageal reconstruction was 51 years (range, 6 to 78 years). Intestinal continuity was established with stomach in 58 patients (71.6%), colon in 16 patients (19.8%), and small bowel in 7 patients (8.6%).

Results. Dysphagia to solids was present in 48 patients (59.3%) and 27 patients (33.3%) required at least one postoperative dilatation. Heartburn was present in 50 patients (61.7%) which required medication for control in 37 patients (45.7%). The number of meals per day was three to four in 58 patients (71.6%), more than four in 15 patients (18.5%), less than three in 6 patients (7.4%), and unknown in 2 patients (2.5%). The size of each meal was smaller than preoperatively in 46 patients (56.8%), larger in 22 patients (27.2%), unchanged in 12 patients (14.8%), and unknown in 1 patient (1.2%). The number of bowel movements per day increased in 37 patients (45.7%), was unchanged in 36 patients (44.4%), and decreased in 8 patients (9.9%). Resection for perforation was associated with smaller postoperative meals compared with resection for stricture (p < 0.05). Age, sex, and type of esophageal reconstruction did not affect late functional outcome. Regarding quality of life, physical functioning, social functioning, and health perception were decreased (p < 0.05). No significant change was observed in role-physical, mental health, bodily pain, energy/fatigue, and role-emotional scores.

Conclusions. Self-assessment of postoperative esophageal symptoms after esophagectomy and reconstruction for benign disease demonstrates that symptoms are frequently present at long-term follow-up and unaffected by the type of reconstruction.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. S. Kent, J. D. Luketich, W. Tsai, P. Churilla, M. Federle, R. Landreneau, M. Alvelo-Rivera, and M. Schuchert
Revisional Surgery After Esophagectomy: An Analysis of 43 Patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 975 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. A. Crestanello, C. Deschamps, S. D. Cassivi, F. C. Nichols III, M. S. Allen, C. Schleck, and P. C. Pairolero
Selective management of intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2005; 129(2): 254 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H.-S. Hsu, C.-Y. Wang, C.-C. Hsieh, and M.-H. Huang
Short-segment colon interposition for end-stage achalasia
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 76(5): 1706 - 1710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.