|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1259-1263
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, OSF St. Francis Medical Center, Peoria, Illinois, USA
b Downstate Heart Transplant Center at OSF St. Francis Medical Center, Peoria, Illinois, USA
Address reprint requests to Dr Hoy, Illinois Cardiac Surgery Associates, 515 NE Glen Oak, Suite 202, Peoria, IL 61603
Background. Early implantation of centrifugal devices in patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock may provide a bridge to recovery and allow subsequent long-term survival.
Methods. Since January 1989, 62 patients were supported with centrifugal pumps because of failure to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass. Indications were postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) (n = 60), bridge to cardiac retransplantation (n = 1), and right ventricular failure (n = 1). Patients ages ranged from 23 to 78 years; 40 were men (65%), and 22 were women (35%). Twenty-two patients (35%) had a left ventricular assist device; 9 patients (15%) had a right ventricular assist device; and 31 patients (50%) had a biventricular assist device. Length of support ranged from 1 day to 19 days.
Results. Forty-two patients (68%) were weaned successfully; 27 patients survived to discharge (44%). Complications included bleeding (n = 41, 66%), renal failure (n = 28, 45%), and respiratory failure (n = 26, 42%). Currently, 23 patients survived 10 or more years (n = 1), 6 to 10 years (n = 7), 1 to 5 years (n = 10), and less than 1 year (n = 5).
Conclusions. Centrifugal pumps are available, easy to use, and relatively inexpensive. Our experience justifies their continued use as a bridge to recovery for patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock, despite the availability and increasing use of more expensive devices.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Aggarwal, F. Cheema, M. C. Oz, and Y. Naka Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1609 - 1628. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hoefer, E. Ruttmann, G. Poelzl, J. Kilo, C. Hoermann, R. Margreiter, G. Laufer, and H. Antretter Outcome evaluation of the bridge to bridge concept in patients with cardiogenic shock. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 82(1): 28 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Oishi, M. Masuda, K.-i. Imasaka, S. Morita, and H. Yasui Limitation of Venoarterial Bypass. Early Predictor and Optimal Conversion Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2005; 13(2): 167 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Rao, M. C. Oz, M. A. Flannery, K. A. Catanese, M. Argenziano, and Y. Naka Revised screening scale to predict survival after insertion of a left ventricular assist device J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2003; 125(4): 855 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. B. Tisol, D. K. Mueller, F. B. Hoy, R. C. Gomez, B. S. Clemson, and S. M. Hussain Ventricular assist device use with mechanical heart valves: an outcome series and literature review Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): 2051 - 2054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |