ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sarnowski, W.
Right arrow Articles by Dyszkiewicz, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sarnowski, W.
Right arrow Articles by Dyszkiewicz, W.

Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1073-1076
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Supplement: cardiothoracic techniques & technologies

Mitral valvuloplasty with sutures used for aortic prosthesis implantation

Wojciech Sarnowski, MDa, Aleksy Ponizyski, MDa, Andrzej Szyszka, MDa, Zofia Oko-Sarnowska, MDa, Mariusz Laciski, MDa, Piotr Buczkowski, MDa, Wojciech Dyszkiewicz, MD, PhDa

a Institute of Cardiology, Karol Marcinkowski University of Medical Sciences in Pozna, Pozna, Poland

Address reprint requests to Dr Sarnowski, ul. Dluga 1/2, 61-848 Pozna, Poland
e-mail: mlacinsk{at}sequoia.usoms.poznan.pl

Presented at the Sixth Annual Cardiothoracic Techniques and Technologies Meeting 2000, Ft Lauderdale, FL, Jan 27–29, 2000.

Background. The purpose of this study was to analyze surgical treatment for aortic valve lesions with coexisting mitral regurgitation (MR).

Methods. Seventy-five patients were divided into two groups according to intensity of MR (group 1, MR less than or equal to II; group 2, MR greater than or equal to II/III). There were two control groups (control 1, only patients with implantation of aortic valve; control 2, patients with implantation of both aortic and mitral prostheses). During implantation of a mechanical aortic prosthesis, the same suture for fixation of a mechanical prosthesis and for suspension of mitral commissural regions and lifting the base of anterior mitral cusp was used.

Results. In all patients, no early death occurred. There were two late deaths, one due to endocarditis, and the other to heart failure. All patients from both groups had decreased MR. Selected echocardiographic parameters improved: end diastolic and end systolic diameter and ejection fraction in group 2 improved in proportion to patients in whom mitral valves were implanted (control 2).

Conclusions. Simultaneous suspension of the mitral commissure area during mechanical aortic prosthesis implantation reduces associated MR. This technique seems to be efficient during implantation of aortic prostheses in patients with coexisting MR.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.