ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, S.
Right arrow Articles by Petsikas, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, S.
Right arrow Articles by Petsikas, D.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1696-1700
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Original articles: General thoracic

Who should follow up lung cancer patients after operation?

Sébastien Gilbert, MDa, Kenneth R. Reid, MDa, Miu Y. Lam, PhDb, Dimitri Petsikas, MDa

a Department of Surgery, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
b Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Address reprint requests to Dr Petsikas, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen’s University, 102 Stuart St, Kingston, ON K7L 2V6 Canada
e-mail: fargoc{at}post.queensu.ca

Background. It is unclear whether follow-up by a thoracic surgeon after lung cancer resection alters survival.

Methods. The charts of 245 early stage (<= IIB) non–small cell lung cancer patients, diagnosed between 1988 and 1995, were reviewed. Follow-up data were complete to January 1, 1997, in 96.3% (236 of 245) of cases.

Results. Ninety of the 111 recurrences were detected before discharge from the thoracic clinic. Despite clinic follow-up, 66.7% (60 of 90) were identified by the family physician, and only 28.9% (26 of 90) by the surgeon. The remaining 4.4% (4 of 90) were detected by other physicians. Ninety-six percent (25 of 26) surgeon-detected recurrences had suspicious clinical or chest radiographic findings, compared with 92% for family physician–detected recurrences (55 of 60; not significant). The cost per recurrence detected by surgeons was Can $4,367. A 75% cost savings could ensure if patients were followed up by their family physician. There was no 5-year survival benefit for patients whose recurrence was detected by the surgeon.

Conclusions. Long-term follow-up after limited-stage non–small cell lung cancer resection could possibly be performed by a family physician alone without compromising overall survival, and with significant cost savings.


Related Article

The right person for the job
Keith S. Naunheim
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000 69: 1653-1654. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. Nakagawa, N. Okumura, K. Ohata, H. Igai, T. Matsuoka, and K. Kameyama
Postrecurrence survival in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 34(3): 499 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
J. Rubins, M. Unger, and G. L. Colice
Follow-up and Surveillance of the Lung Cancer Patient Following Curative Intent Therapy: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline (2nd Edition)
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 355S - 367S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
C. C. Earle
Outcomes Research in Lung Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 56 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. J. Battafarano, S. D. Force, B. F. Meyers, J. Bell, T. J. Guthrie, J. D. Cooper, and G. A. Patterson
Benefits of resection for metachronous lung cancer
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2004; 127(3): 836 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
D. G. Pfister, D. H. Johnson, C. G. Azzoli, W. Sause, T. J. Smith, S. Baker Jr, J. Olak, D. Stover, J. R. Strawn, A. T. Turrisi, et al.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Treatment of Unresectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Guideline: Update 2003
J. Clin. Oncol., January 15, 2004; 22(2): 330 - 353.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
G. L. Colice, J. Rubins, and M. Unger
Follow-up and Surveillance of the Lung Cancer Patient Following Curative-Intent Therapy
Chest, January 1, 2003; 123 (2009): 272S - 283S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch SurgHome page
J. P. Lamont, J. T. Kakuda, D. Smith, L. D. Wagman, and F. W. Grannis Jr
Systematic Postoperative Radiologic Follow-up in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer for Detecting Second Primary Lung Cancer in Stage IA
Arch Surg, August 1, 2002; 137(8): 935 - 939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch SurgHome page
J. R. Benfield
Systematic Postoperative Radiologic Follow-up in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer for Detecting Second Primary Lung Cancer in Stage IA--Invited Critique
Arch Surg, August 1, 2002; 137(8): 940 - 940.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. H. Cole Jr, J. W. Pate, and D. Weiman
The surgeon and the follow-up clinic
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 757 - 757.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Gilbert, K. R. Reid, and D. Petsikas
The surgeon and the follow-up clinic: reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 757 - 757.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. S. Naunheim
The right person for the job
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2000; 69(6): 1653 - 1654.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.