HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Online Discussion Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Peter C. Laussen David P. Bichell Pedro J. del Nido Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Laussen, P. C. Articles by del Nido, P. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Laussen, P. C. Articles by del Nido, P. J.

Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:591-596
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original Articles

Postoperative recovery in children after minimum versus full-length sternotomy

^a Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
^b Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
^c Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
^d Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
^e Departments of Anesthesia, Cardiac Surgery, Psychiatry, and Orthopedic Surgery, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Laussen, Cardiac Anesthesia Service, Children’s Hospital 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115
e-mail: laussen{at}al.tch.harvard.edu

Background. Minimal access incisions for pediatric cardiac surgery have been reported to hasten postoperative recovery. This prospective study compared recovery after a minimum versus full-length sternotomy for repair of atrial septal defects in children.

Methods. We studied 35 children undergoing atrial septal defect repair using a full-length sternotomy (n = 18) or ministernotomy (n = 17) according to the surgeon’s preference. All children were managed according to an established clinical practice guideline. Intraoperative comparisons included patient demographics, bypass and cross-clamp times, and, as a measure of stress response, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and lactate levels at six time intervals throughout the surgical procedure. Postoperative comparisons included pain scores at 6, 12, and 24 hours, frequency of emesis, analgesic requirements, respiratory rate and gas exchange, and length of intensive care unit and total hospital stay. Nurse and parent assessment scores of overall recovery were constructed using visual analog and Likert scales.

Results. No significant differences between mini- versus full-length sternotomy were detected for the measured outcome variables. No adverse outcomes were detected.

Conclusions. In this prospective study, a ministernotomy did not enhance postoperative recovery, and the primary advantage appears to be an improved cosmetic result.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. A. Bockeria, A. I. Kim, and T. R. Grigoryants eComment: Re: Ministernotomy for repair of congenital cardiac disease Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, November 1, 2009; 9(5): 822 - 822. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Perrotta and S. Lentini Ministernotomy approach for surgery of the aortic root and ascending aorta Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, November 1, 2009; 9(5): 849 - 858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. A. Sebastian, K. J. Guleserian, S. R. Leonard, and J. M. Forbess Ministernotomy for repair of congenital cardiac disease Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, November 1, 2009; 9(5): 819 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. L. Vida, M. A. Padalino, G. Boccuzzo, A. A. Veshti, S. Speggiorin, G. Falasco, and G. Stellin Minimally invasive operation for congenital heart disease: A sex-differentiated approach. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2009; 138(4): 933 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Ando, Y. Takahashi, and T. Kikuchi Short Operation Time: An Important Element to Reduce Operative Invasiveness in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 80(2): 631 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Nishigaki, H. Nishi, Y. Kume, K. Kitabayashi, and K. Miyamoto Minimal Access via Lower Partial Sternotomy for Congenital Heart Defects Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2005; 13(1): 42 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Wu, G. Luo, S. Li, X. Shen, and F. Lu Comparison of Different Approaches for Pediatric Congenital Heart Diseases Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2003; 11(3): 226 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. Detter Reply to Meharwal and Trehan Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 20(4): 895 - 896. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Formigari, R. M. Di Donato, E. Mazzera, A. Carotti, G. Rinelli, F. Parisi, L. Pasquini, and L. Ballerini Minimally invasive or interventional repair of atrial septal defects in children: experience in 171 cases and comparison with conventional strategies J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2001; 37(6): 1707 - 1712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Hagl, U. Stock, A. Haverich, and G. Steinhoff Evaluation of Different Minimally Invasive Techniques in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery : Is a Full Sternotomy Always a Necessity? Chest, February 1, 2001; 119(2): 622 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]