ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, E. P.
Right arrow Articles by Wadleigh, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, E. P.
Right arrow Articles by Wadleigh, R.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:363-368
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles

Aggressive multimodality therapy for stage III esophageal cancer: a phase I/II study

E. Pendleton Alexander, MDa, Timothy Lipman, MDb, John Harmon, MDa, Robert Wadleigh, MDc

a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
b Divisions of Gastroenterology and General Surgery, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
c Division of Medical Oncology, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Alexander, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, George Washington University Medical Center, 50 Irving St, NW, Washington, DC 20422
e-mail: epalexander{at}med.va.gov

Presented at the Forty-fifth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Orlando, FL, Nov 12–14, 1998.

Background. Stage III advanced locoregional esophageal carcinoma is frequently unresectable and inconsistently represented in therapeutic trials of esophageal cancer.

Methods. From 1992 to 1998, 34 of 131 total esophageal cancer patients were designated stage III (16 T3N1, 9 T4N0, 9 T4N1) and medically fit to enter a combined modality protocol with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (CI5-FU, 300 to 600 mg/m2/day), high-dose external beam irradiation (60 Gy), and interval esophagectomy. Staging before and after induction therapy included computed tomography, endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound.

Results. Significant toxicity from induction therapy included death (5/34; 14.7%), pneumonitis (5/34; 14.7%), mucositis (13/34; 38%), and hand-foot syndrome (3/34; 8.8%). In addition to the five deaths, 11 patients did not proceed to operation because of development of esophagorespiratory fistula in 3, distant disease in 2, persistence of T4 stage in 2, progression of comorbidities in 2, and patient refusal in 2. There was a discrepancy between clinical complete response (cCR) at restaging 56% (19/34) and pathologic CR (pCR) noted at the time of operation (8/34; 23.5%). Complete resections were possible in 16 of 18 patients explored. Complications in 4 patients included: death (1), airway injury (1), chylothorax requiring reoperation (1), anastomotic leak (1), recurrent nerve injury with vocal cord paresis (2), and ascaris infection (1). Actuarial survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank testing showed a 36-month survival of 20% for the group as a whole and 27% for patients restaged cCR (cCR vs PR, p = 0.0046). Treatment failure is predominantly distant, with good local control in resected patients. N0 node status was strongly associated with survival (N0 vs N1 p = 0.0024). There is a trend towards improved survival in the resected group (resected 22% vs nonresected 10% at 3 years, p = 0.17).

Conclusions. Response rates and survival are commensurate with multiple completed phase II and III trials. These are attained at a higher treatment-related mortality. T4 patients can be successfully resected in selected patients. Even in advanced disease, nodal status is a significant predictor of survival.


Related Article

Discussion
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000 69: 368. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
N. P. Rizk, E. Venkatraman, M. S. Bains, B. Park, R. Flores, L. Tang, D. H. Ilson, B. D. Minsky, and V. W. Rusch
American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System Does Not Accurately Predict Survival in Patients Receiving Multimodality Therapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2007; 25(5): 507 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. W.C. Entwistle III and M. Goldberg
Multimodality therapy for resectable cancer of the thoracic esophagus
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2002; 73(3): 1009 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. P. Alexander, G. D. Trachiotis, T. O. Lipman, and R. G. Wadleigh
Evolving management and outcome of esophageal cancer with airway involvement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71(5): 1640 - 1644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.