HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Gregory A. Lowdermilk Lawrence R. McBride Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Swartz, M. T. Articles by McBride, L. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Swartz, M. T. Articles by McBride, L. R.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:2248-2251
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original Articles

Ventricular assist device support in patients with mechanical heart valves

^a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Address reprint requests to Mr Swartz, Department of Surgery, St. Louis University, 3635 Vista Ave at Grand Blvd, PO Box 15250, St. Louis, MO 63110-0250
e-mail: swartzmt{at}slu.edu

Background. Due to potential thromboembolic complications, mechanical valves within the native heart are often considered contraindications to ventricular assist device (VAD) support.

Methods. A retrospective review of VAD cases between June 1982 and March 1998 showed 8 patients with mechanical valves who were supported with Thoratec (Pleasanton, CA) VADs.

Results. There were 6 males and 2 females ranging in age from 20 to 69 years (mean 49.8 ± 5.6). Four patients were supported when they could not be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass after reparative procedures and were thought to have reversible injuries. Four patients were supported as a bridge-to-cardiac transplantation. Two patients had mechanical mitral valves, 2 had aortic valve replacements, 1 had an aortic homograft and mechanical mitral valve, 2 had mechanical aortic and mitral prosthesis, and 1 patient had aortic, mitral, and triscupid valves. The types of valvular prostheses were St. Jude (5 patients) and Bjork-Shiley (3 patients). Duration of support ranged from 3.0 to 150 days (mean 34 days). Four patients were supported with biventricular assist devices and 4 had left VADs. Dextran and intravenous heparin anticoagulation were used in the shorter duration patients, with warfarin being used in the bridge patients. One patient received warfarin and aspirin. At the time of autopsy or device removal, only 1 of the 12 mechanical intracardiac valves showed any evidence of thrombosis, including the aortic valves in 2 patients supported for 2 and 5 months. There were no clinical thromboembolic events. Four patients (50%) were discharged (1 weaned, 3 transplanted).

Conclusions. The 50% (4 of 8) survival rate compares favorably with the 44% (41 of 92) overall survival rate for our Thoratec patients (bridge plus recovery) who did not have mechanical prosthetic valves. These data suggest that patients with mechanical intracardiac valves can be supported for short durations with some additional risk, which is yet to be determined.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Goda, H. Takayama, S.-W. Pak, N. Uriel, D. Mancini, Y. Naka, and U. P. Jorde Aortic Valve Procedures at the Time of Ventricular Assist Device Placement Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2011; 91(3): 750 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Krishan, S. Pinney, and A. C. Anyanwu Successful use of continuous flow ventricular assist device in a patient with mechanical mitral and aortic valve prosthesis without replacement or exclusion of valves Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, February 1, 2010; 10(2): 325 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Chumnanvej, M. J. Wood, T. E. MacGillivray, and M. F. V. Melo Perioperative Echocardiographic Examination for Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2007; 105(3): 583 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. B. Tisol, D. K. Mueller, F. B. Hoy, R. C. Gomez, B. S. Clemson, and S. M. Hussain Ventricular assist device use with mechanical heart valves: an outcome series and literature review Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): 2051 - 2054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. R. McBride, K. S. Naunheim, A. C. Fiore, R. G. Johnson, D. A. Moroney, J. A. Brannan, and M. T. Swartz Risk analysis in patients bridged to transplantation Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2001; 71(6): 1839 - 1844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Rao, J. P. Slater, N. M. Edwards, Y. Naka, and M. C. Oz Surgical management of valvular disease in patients requiring left ventricular assist device support Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71(5): 1448 - 1453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]