HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Joseph R. Elbeery Nicola A. Francalancia Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chitwood, W. R. Articles by Lust, R. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chitwood, W. R., Jr Articles by Lust, R. M.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1974-1977
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

II. Surgical Myocardial Protection

Minimally invasive cardiac operation: adapting cardioprotective strategies

^a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, North Carolina, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Chitwood, Department of Surgery, East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27858;
e-mail: chitwood{at}brody.med.ecu.edu

Presented at the International Symposium on Myocardial Protection From Surgical Ischemic-Reperfusion Injury, Asheville, NC, Sept 21–24, 1997.

Abstract

Background. Minimally invasive heart operation differs from traditional cardiac operations through the omission of a sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass, or both. Current concerns with minimally invasive operation include: operative safety, learning curve, operative times, arrest times, and adequacy of myocardial protection. While many of the protective strategies used for traditional procedures may be applied to minimally invasive cardiac operations, the safe applications of minimally invasive operations require unique techniques of myocardial protection.

Methods and Results. Omission of extracorporeal perfusion may benefit patients through attenuation of systemic inflammatory response, decrement in neurologic insults, and reduced bleeding complications. As a counterbalance, surgeons must consider long-term operative quality and level of myocardial protection provided during beating heart coronary operation. Current issues that must be addressed include: pharmacologic management, coronary collateralization and ischemic preconditioning, the utility of intraluminal coronary shunts, and technical adequacy of the anastomosis. Nonsternotomy cardiopulmonary bypass methods utilize alternative incisions and "port-access" technology, and may render more rapid patient recovery including: decreased pain, shortened hospital stay, and more rapid return to work. Altered strategies of myocardial protection in a closed chest environment must address: method of cannulation, technique of aortic occlusion, rapidity and maintenance of cardiac arrest, and cardiac de-airing techniques.

Conclusions. Previous obstacles to minimally invasive cardiac operations included limitations in operative exposure, inadequate perfusion technology, and inability to provide myocardial protection. Recent advances in videoscopic visualization and evolving mechanisms of myocardial protection may justify the expanding application of minimally invasive techniques.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Muraki, C. D. Morris, J. M. Budde, R. N. Otto, Z.-Q. Zhao, J. D. Puskas, R. A. Guyton, and J. Vinten-Johansen Preserved myocardial blood flow and oxygen supply-demand balance with active coronary perfusion during simulated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2002; 123(1): 53 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]