|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1628-1634
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Cardiac Surgical Research Unit, Baker Medical Research Institute and Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
b Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
c Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Address reprint requests to Dr Rosenfeldt, Baker Medical Research Institute, PO Box 6492, Melbourne, Victoria 8008, Australia
Background. The protective effect of University of Wisconsin solution (UW) for hypothermic storage of donor hearts has been demonstrated in the laboratory. However, clinical usage is associated with occasional primary graft failures. We postulated that this could be related to adverse effects of UW on the coronary vasculature during cardiac implantation and rewarming. We therefore assessed recovery of contractile function and coronary flow in rat hearts after cardioplegic arrest using UW compared with St. Thomas solution (ST) at 4°C or 25°C.
Methods. Cardioplegia was induced in isolated rat hearts using either UW or ST at 4°C. Hearts were then maintained at 4°C or 25°C. In some hearts, UW at 4°C was used for inducing arrest followed by flushing with ST at 4°C and then rewarming to 25°C. After 40 minutes of arrest, recovery of function and coronary flow were measured. Nuclear track emulsion was used to assess microvascular competence.
Results. Compared with STtreated hearts, UWtreated hearts showed significant reduction in recovery of function at 25°C (76.2% ± 4.0% versus 25.0% ± 4.1%; p < 0.01) but not at 4°C (88.0% ± 1.6% versus 87.1% ± 2.6%). Recovery of coronary flow in the UWtreated hearts at 25°C was significantly lower than that in the STtreated hearts at 25°C (71.7% ± 3.0% versus 94.5% ± 6.3%; p < 0.01). At 25°C, microvascular competence was reduced in the UW group compared with the ST group. At 25°C, flushing out UW with ST resulted in greater recovery of function compared with UW throughout (73.4% ± 7.1% versus 25.0% ± 4.1%; p < 0.01).
Conclusions. University of Wisconsin solution provides effective donor heart protection under hypothermic conditions but can be deleterious at warmer temperatures.
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1999 68: 1634-1635.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. L. Sloots, J. Vinten-Johansen, and G. P. Dobson Warm nondepolarizing adenosine and lidocaine cardioplegia: Continuous versus intermittent delivery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2007; 133(5): 1171 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Dobson and M. W. Jones Adenosine and lidocaine: a new concept in nondepolarizing surgical myocardial arrest, protection, and preservation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2004; 127(3): 794 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Stoica, D. K. Satchithananda, J. Dunning, and S. R. Large Two-decade analysis of cardiac storage for transplantation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 20(4): 792 - 798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ozyazicioglu, A. Ates, and I. Yekeler Long-term preservation of isolated heart Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2001; 71(1): 403 - 404. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |