ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Donald D. Glower
Kevin P. Landolfo
Peter K. Smith
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glower, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glower, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, P. K.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1529-1531
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Supplement: Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

Comparison of direct aortic and femoral cannulation for port-access cardiac operations

Donald D. Glower, MDa, Fiona M. Clements, MDa, Norbert P. Debruijn, MDa, Mark Stafford-Smith, MDa, R. Duane Davis, MDa, Kevin P. Landolfo, MDa, Peter K. Smith, MDa

a Departments of Surgery and Anesthesia, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Glower, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3851, Durham, NC 27710
e-mail: glowe001{at}mc.duke.edu

Presented at Evolving Techniques and Technologies in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, San Antonio, TX, Jan 22–23, 1999.

Abstract

Background. Differences in outcome after direct aortic cannulation (AORT) in the chest versus standard femoral arterial cannulation (FEM) have not been defined for minimally invasive cardiac operations utilizing the port-access approach.

Methods. A retrospective study was performed of 165 patients undergoing port-access cardiac mitral valve operation (n = 126) or coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 39). In 113 patients, FEM was used, while in 52 patients, AORT was accomplished through a port in the first intercostal space.

Results. AORT eliminated endoaortic balloon clamp migration (0/36 [0%] vs 17/95 [18%]), and groin wound or femoral arterial complications (0/52 [0%] vs 11/113 [10%]) without changing procedure times (363 ± 55 vs 355 ± 70 minutes). Complications attributable to AORT were injury to the right internal mammary artery and aortic cannulation site bleeding in 1 patient each.

Conclusions. Direct aortic cannulation is technically easy, allows use of an endoaortic clamp, and avoids aorto-iliac arterial disease, the groin incision, and possible femoral arterial injury associated with femoral arterial cannulation. Direct arterial cannulation should expand the pool of patients eligible for port-access operation, and may become the standard for port-access procedures.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Suzuki, F. D. Pagani, and S. F. Bolling
Left Thoracotomy for Multiple-Time Redo Mitral Valve Surgery Using On-Pump Beating Heart Technique
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 86(2): 466 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
F. Farhat, M. Vergnat, P. Blanc, P. Chiari, and O. Jegaden
Which place for Port AccessTM surgery in coronary artery bypass grafting? A mid-term follow up study
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2006; 5(1): 71 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
B. E. Muhs, A. C. Galloway, M. Lombino, M. Silberstein, E. A. Grossi, S. B. Colvin, P. Lamparello, G. Jacobowitz, M. A. Adelman, C. Rockman, et al.
Arterial Injuries from Femoral Artery Cannulation with Port Access Cardiac Surgery
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 1, 2005; 39(2): 153 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. C. Saunders, E. A. Grossi, R. Sharony, C. F. Schwartz, G. H. Ribakove, A. T. Culliford, J. Delianides, F. G. Baumann, A. C. Galloway, and S. B. Colvin
Minimally invasive technology for mitral valve surgery via left thoracotomy: Experience with forty cases
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2004; 127(4): 1026 - 1032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
T J Spyt and A C De Souza
Minimally invasive therapy and robotics: Treatments in ischaemic heart disease
Br. Med. Bull., October 1, 2001; 59(1): 261 - 268.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. D. Glower, J. Komtebedde, F. M. Clements, N. P. Debruijn, M. Stafford-Smith, and M. F. Newman
Direct aortic cannulation for port-access mitral or coronary artery bypass grafting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 68(5): 1878 - 1880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.