|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1022-1028
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
b Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
c Department of Radiology, The University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
Address reprint requests to Dr Kernstine, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Room 1616B JCP, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242-1083
e-mail: kemp-kernstine{at}uiowa.edu
Presented at the Poster Session of the Thirty-fifth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Antonio, TX, Jan 2527, 1999.
Abstract
Background. To determine the relative utility of positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging with Combidex (MRI-C) in the non-invasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN), we compared the three tests individual performance with surgical mediastinal sampling. In contrast to prior studies, cytology was not used.
Methods. The MLN were evaluated using PET and CT in 64 NSCLC patients. MRI-C was performed in 9 of these patients. MLN with a PET standard uptake value greater than or equal to 2.5, or greater than 1 cm in the short axis by CT or lack of MRI-C signal change were considered positive for metastatic disease. All MLN were sampled and subjected to standard pathologic analysis. PET, CT, and MRI-C scans were interpreted blinded to the histopathological results. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for each scan type to appropriately stage MLN was determined using pathologic results as the standard.
Results. Thirty patients had stage I disease, 8 stage II, 9 stage IIIA, 7 stage IIIB, and 10 stage IV. Two-hundred-and-thirty MLN were sampled. Sixteen patients had metastatic mediastinal disease. Compared to the pathological results, PET, CT, and MRI-C had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 70%, 86%, 84%; 65%, 79%, 76%; 86%, 82%, and 83%, respectively. PET and MRI-C were statistically more accurate than CT (p < 0.001). In cases where PET and CT did not identify MLN involvement with NSCLC, 8% (2/25) were pathologically positive.
Conclusions. PET and MRI-C are statistically more accurate than CT. However, the differences are small and may not be clinically relevant. No technique was sensitive or specific enough to change the current recommendation to perform mediastinoscopy for MLN staging in NSCLC.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. C. Ung, D. E. Maziak, J. A. Vanderveen, C. A. Smith, K. Gulenchyn, C. Lacchetti, W. K. Evans, and Lung Cancer Disease Site Group of Cancer Care Onta 18Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Diagnosis and Staging of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review J Natl Cancer Inst, December 5, 2007; 99(23): 1753 - 1767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hellwig, T. P. Graeter, D. Ukena, A. Groeschel, G. W. Sybrecht, H.-J. Schaefers, and C.-M. Kirsch 18F-FDG PET for Mediastinal Staging of Lung Cancer: Which SUV Threshold Makes Sense? J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 1761 - 1766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Silvestri, M. K. Gould, M. L. Margolis, L. T. Tanoue, D. McCrory, E. Toloza, and F. Detterbeck Noninvasive Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidenced-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition) Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 178S - 201S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Schrevens, N. Lorent, C. Dooms, and J. Vansteenkiste The Role of PET Scan in Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Oncologist, November 1, 2004; 9(6): 633 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Pfister, D. H. Johnson, C. G. Azzoli, W. Sause, T. J. Smith, S. Baker Jr, J. Olak, D. Stover, J. R. Strawn, A. T. Turrisi, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Treatment of Unresectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Guideline: Update 2003 J. Clin. Oncol., January 15, 2004; 22(2): 330 - 353. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Gould, W. G. Kuschner, C. E. Rydzak, C. C. Maclean, A. N. Demas, H. Shigemitsu, J. K. Chan, and D. K. Owens Test Performance of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography for Mediastinal Staging in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Ann Intern Med, December 2, 2003; 139(11): 879 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. V. Gonzalez-Stawinski, A. Lemaire, F. Merchant, E. O'Halloran, R. E. Coleman, D. H. Harpole, and T. A. D'Amico A comparative analysis of positron emission tomography and mediastinoscopy in staging non-small cell lung cancer J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2003; 126(6): 1900 - 1904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Kern Sounding the Mediastinum Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 2003; 168(11): 1261 - 1262. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kumar, K. Yamada, G. P. Ladas, and P. Goldstraw Mediastinoscopy and mediastinotomy after cardiac surgery: are safety and efficacy affected by prior sternotomy? Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2003; 76(3): 872 - 876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kimura, N. Iwai, S. Ando, K. Kakizawa, N. Yamamoto, H. Hoshino, and T. Anayama A prospective study of indications for mediastinoscopy in lung cancer with CT findings, tumor size, and tumor markers Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 75(6): 1734 - 1739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. LeBlanc, R. Espada, and G. Ergun Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Staging Techniques and Endoscopic Ultrasound: Tissue Is Still the Issue Chest, May 1, 2003; 123(5): 1718 - 1725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Eggeling, T. Martin, J. Bottger, T. Beinert, and K. Gellert Invasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer - a prospective study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2002; 22(5): 679 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. E. Schmidt, E. A. Woltering, W. R. Webb, O. M. Garcia, J. E. Cohen, and M. H. Rozans Sentinel nodal assessment in patients with carcinoma of the lung Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2002; 74(3): 870 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. D'Amico, T. Z. Wong, D. H. Harpole, S. D. Brown, and R. E. Coleman Impact of computed tomography-positron emission tomography fusion in staging patients with thoracic malignancies Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2002; 74(1): 160 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. H. Kernstine, K. A. McLaughlin, Y. Menda, N. P. Rossi, D. J. Kahn, D. L. Bushnell, M. M. Graham, C. K. Brown, and M. T. Madsen Can FDG-PET reduce the need for mediastinoscopy in potentially resectable nonsmall cell lung cancer? Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 73(2): 394 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.A. Verschakelen, J. Bogaert, and W. De Wever Computed tomography in staging for lung cancer Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(35_suppl): 40S - 48s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.F. Vansteenkiste Imaging in lung cancer: positron emission tomography scan Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(35_suppl): 49S - 60s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yamada, P. Kumar, and P. Goldstraw Cervical mediastinoscopy after total laryngectomy and radiotherapy: its feasibility Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 21(1): 71 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.J. Poncelet, M. Lonneux, E. Coche, B. Weynand, and Ph. Noirhomme PET-FDG scan enhances but does not replace preoperative surgical staging in non-small cell lung carcinoma Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2001; 20(3): 468 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Laking and P Price 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and the staging of early lung cancer Thorax, September 1, 2001; 56(90002): ii38 - 44. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.W. A. Oosterhuis, P. H.M.H. Theunissen, and E. C.M. Bollen Improved pre-operative mediastinal staging in non-small-cell lung cancer by serial sectioning and immunohistochemical staining of lymph-node biopsies Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2001; 20(2): 335 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.F. Vansteenkiste and S.G. Stroobants The role of positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in respiratory oncology Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2001; 17(4): 802 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. F. Roberts, D. M. Follette, D. von Haag, J. A. Park, P. E. Valk, T. R. Pounds, and D. M. Hopkins Factors associated with false-positive staging of lung cancer by positron emission tomography Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2000; 70(4): 1154 - 1159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |