ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Thierry Langanay
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Logeais, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Coutté, M.-B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Logeais, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Coutté, M.-B.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:421-425
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles

Aortic Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis: a 12-year experience

Yves Logeais, MDa, Thierry Langanay, MDa, Alain Leguerrier, MDa, Claude Rioux, MDa, Jacques Chaperon, MDa, Marie-Bénédicte Coutté, MDa

a Clinique Chirurgicale Cardiovasculaire et Thoracique, Hopital Pontchaillou, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France

Address reprint requests to Dr Logeais, Centre Cardio Pneumologique, Service de Chirurgie Thoracique et Cardiovasculaire, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033 Rennes Cedex 09, France

Background. After 35 years of cardiac valve replacement, the ideal substitute remains to be found. Homografts are considered best but, due to their scarcity, cannot meet the need of valve replacement. Artificial valves (mechanical or biological) remain the most commonly used but controversy is still present as to the better choice. We tested the Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis for its efficacy in valve replacement operations.

Methods. From 1983 to 1995, 1,108 consecutive patients had an isolated aortic valve replacement with a porcine Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis, model 2650 supra-annular valve. Mean age was 73.8 ± 8.3 years. Aortic stenosis was the most common lesion (1,049 patients, 94.7%). The follow-up of 980 operative survivors was 96% complete and represented a total of 4,735 patient-years (maximum, 13.8 years; mean, 4 years and 10 months).

Results. Actuarial survival including operative mortality (128 patients, 11.6%) was 43.6% ± 2.3% at 10 years and 27.3% ± 3.3% at 12 years and, at that time, was not statistically different from those of the normal French population matched for age and sex. Structural deterioration of the valve was observed in 27 patients, an actuarial freedom of 94.2% ± 1.5% at 10 years and 83.8% ± 4.5% at 12 years. Hazard function revealed a stable and low risk of structural deterioration until 10 years and significantly increased risk after that. Young age was found to be an increasing risk factor of deterioration. Reoperation for valve-related complications was necessary in 30 patients, an actuarial freedom of 94.5% ± 1.4% at 10 years.

Conclusions. The Carpentier-Edwards porcine supra-annular valve affords a good durability up to 10 years, with a low rate of reoperation. The risk of structural deterioration decreases with older age. It is our valve of choice in elderly patients.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
O. Lund and M. Bland
Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2006; 132(1): 20 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J P A Puvimanasinghe, J J M Takkenberg, M B Edwards, M J C Eijkemans, E W Steyerberg, L A van Herwerden, K M Taylor, G L Grunkemeier, J D F Habbema, and A J J C Bogers
Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation
Heart, October 1, 2004; 90(10): 1172 - 1178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Le Tourneau, A. Vincentelli, G. Fayad, C. Savoye, O. H. Fabre, A. Prat, and H. Warembourg
Ten-year echocardiographic and clinical follow-up of aortic Carpentier-Edwards pericardial and supraannular prosthesis: a case-match study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 2010 - 2015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. P. A. Puvimanasinghe, E. W. Steyerberg, J. J. M. Takkenberg, M. J. C. Eijkemans, L. A van Herwerden, A. J. J. C. Bogers, and J. D. F. Habbema
Prognosis After Aortic Valve Replacement With a Bioprosthesis : Predictions Based on Meta-Analysis and Microsimulation
Circulation, March 20, 2001; 103(11): 1535 - 1541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.