ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
James M. Levett
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levett, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carey, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levett, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carey, R. G.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:353-358
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Data Base Panel

Measuring for improvement: from Toyota to thoracic surgery

James M. Levett, MDa, Raymond G. Carey, PhDa

a Department of Surgery, Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Illinois, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Levett, Department of Surgical Specialists, Physicians’ Clinic of Iowa, PC, 830 Fourth Ave SE, Cedar Rapids, IA 52403

Presented at the Thirty-fourth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, New Orleans, LA, Jan 26–28, 1998.

Abstract

Background. Measuring quality has become a high priority in the era of managed care. Nevertheless, it can be counterproductive to use the same methods for measuring improvement in surgical procedures and processes as we use for measurement in basic research. Techniques of statistical process control have been used for many years to measure process improvement in industry and are now being applied to health care.

Methods. Examples of using statistical process control charts to monitor coronary artery bypass grafting mortality, intensive care unit admission time, and length of stay are reviewed.

Results. The major advantage of using control chart methodology is that it allows one to determine whether the process being evaluated is in fact stable and to detect when significant or special cause variation occurs.

Conclusions. Summary statistics currently provided to purchasers of care and regulatory agencies do not ensure that the processes being evaluated are stable. We need to look at data over time with statistically validated methods such as control charts to better monitor our processes of care and thereby provide accurate statistics.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qual Saf Health CareHome page
J. Thor, J. Lundberg, J. Ask, J. Olsson, C. Carli, K. P. Harenstam, and M. Brommels
Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review
Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 387 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.