ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Alejandro Aris
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aris, A.
Right arrow Articles by Litvan, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aris, A.
Right arrow Articles by Litvan, H.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1583-1587
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles

Ministernotomy versus median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a prospective, randomized study

Alejandro Aris, MD, PhDa, Maria Luisa Cámara, MD, PhDa, José Montiel, MDa, Luis Javier Delgado, MDa, Josefina Galán, MDb, Héctor Litvan, MDb

a Departments of Cardiac Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
b Department of Anesthesia, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

Address reprint requests to Dr Aris, Cardiac Surgery Service, Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Avenida San A.M. Claret 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
e-mail: aaris{at}hsp.santpau.es

Presented at the Thirty-fifth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Antonio, TX, Jan 25–27, 1999.

Background. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement reduces surgical trauma and, supposedly, postoperative pain, blood loss, and length of stay. A prospective, randomized study was designed to prove these theoretical advantages.

Methods. Forty patients undergoing isolated, elective aortic valve replacement were randomized into two equal groups. Patients in group M underwent aortic valve replacement through a ministernotomy (reversed L or reversed C). In group S, a median sternotomy was used. The anesthetic and surgical protocol was identical for both groups. Pain was evaluated on a daily basis. Pulmonary function tests were performed preoperatively and before hospital discharge in all patients.

Results. There were two deaths in each group. Cross-clamp time was longer in group M: 70 ± 19 minutes versus 51 ± 13 minutes in group S (p = 0.005). There were no statistically significant differences between groups M and S in pump time (95 ± 20 minutes versus 83 ± 19 minutes), extubation time (9.9 hours in both groups), chest drainage (479 ± 274 mL/ 24 hours versus 355 ± 159 mL/ 24 hours), transfusion requirements (27% in both groups), pain evaluation (1.34 ± 1.3 versus 2.15 ± 1.5), length of stay (6.2 ± 2.3 days versus 6.3 ± 2.5 days), and cosmetic appraisal. Forced vital capacity decreased 26% from preoperative reference values in group M and 33% in group S (p = not significant). Forced expiratory volume in 1 second decreased 22% and 35%, respectively (p = not significant).

Conclusions. This study has failed to prove the theoretical advantages of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. With this technique, cross-clamp time is longer than with a median sternotomy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Tabata, R. Umakanthan, L. H. Cohn, R. M. Bolman III, P. S. Shekar, F. Y. Chen, G. S. Couper, and S. F. Aranki
Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 537 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. Murtuza, J. R. Pepper, R. DeL Stanbridge, C. Jones, C. Rao, A. Darzi, and T. Athanasiou
Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement: Is It Worth It?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 1121 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
M. A Moustafa, A. A Abdelsamad, G. Zakaria, and M. M Omarah
Minimal vs Median Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2007; 15(6): 472 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
M. Tabata, S. F Aranki, J. A Fox, G. S Couper, L. H Cohn, and P. S Shekar
Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement in Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2007; 15(3): 225 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
V. M. Hsu, P. Atluri, M. G. Keane, and Y. J. Woo
Minimally invasive aortic valve papillary fibroelastoma resection
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2006; 5(6): 779 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
I. Bakir, F. P. Casselman, F. Wellens, H. Jeanmart, R. De Geest, I. Degrieck, F. Van Praet, Y. Vermeulen, and H. Vanermen
Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1599 - 1604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
J.-M. De Smet, B. Rondelet, J.-L. Jansens, M. Antoine, D. De Canniere, and J.-L. Le Clerc
Assessment Based on EuroSCORE of Ministernotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2004; 12(1): 53 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. C. Stamou, E. I. Kapetanakis, R. Lowery, K. A. Jablonski, T. L. Frankel, and P. J. Corso
Allogeneic blood transfusion requirements after minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a risk-Adjusted analysis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 76(4): 1101 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Bonacchi, E. Prifti, G. Giunti, and G. Sani
Lesser impairment of respiratory function is the mechanism of faster recovery after partial sternotomy for valve replacement: Reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 75(4): 1360 - 1361.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. Doll, M. A. Borger, J. Hain, J. Bucerius, T. Walther, J. F. Gummert, and F. W. Mohr
Minimal access aortic valve replacement: effects on morbidity and resource utilization
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 74(4): S1318 - 1322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Bonacchi, E. Prifti, G. Giunti, G. Frati, and G. Sani
Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 73(2): 460 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Aris
Invited commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 73(2): 465 - 466.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Bauer, M. Pasic, R. Ewert, and R. Hetzer
Ministernotomy versus complete sternotomy for coronary bypass operations: No difference in postoperative pulmonary function
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2001; 121(4): 702 - 707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Taguchi, T. Niibori, and K. Moro
Use of three-dimensional computed tomography images in deciding the approach for ministernotomy operations
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2000; 70(3): 1090 - 1093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
W. Ehrlich, W. Skwara, W.-P. Klovekorn, M. Roth, and E. P. Bauer
Do patients want minimally invasive aortic valve replacement?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2000; 17(6): 714 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. N. Olinger
Informed advice
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1999; 67(6): 1545 - 1546.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.