ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Heinrich E. Mächler
Bruno Rigler
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mächler, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rigler, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mächler, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rigler, B.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1001-1005
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles

Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve operations: a prospective study in 120 patients

Heinrich E. Mächler, MDa, Peter Bergmann, MDa, Michael Anelli-Monti, MDa, Drago Dacar, MDa, Peter Rehak, PhDa, Igor Knez, MDa, Luay Salaymeh, MDa, Elisabeth Mahla, MDb, Bruno Rigler, MDa

a Departments of Department of Cardiac Surgery, Karl-Franzens University Graz, Graz, Austria
b Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, Karl-Franzens University Graz, Graz, Austria

Accepted for publication September 13, 1998.

Address reprint requests to Dr Mächler, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Karl-Franzens University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, A-8036 Graz, Austria
e-mail: heinrich.maechler{at}kfunigraz.ac.at

Background. Risk evaluation comparing the minimally invasive and standard aortic valve operations has not been studied.

Methods. Four surgeons were randomly assigned to perform the minimally invasive (L-shaped sternotomy) (group 1) or the conventional (group 2) operation in 120 patients exclusively.

Results. In both groups (n = 60) a CarboMedics prothesis was implanted in 90% of patients. There was no significant difference in the cross-clamping period (group 1, 60 minutes; range, 35 to 116 minutes), in the duration of extracorporal circulation (group 1, 84 minutes; range, 51 to 179 minutes) or in the time from skin-to-skin (group 1, 195 minutes; range, 145 to 466 minutes). Patients in group 1 were extubated earlier (p < 0.001), the postoperative blood loss was less (p < 0.001), and the need for analgesics was reduced (p < 0.05). In 5 patients in group 1 a redo operation was required for bleeding (p > 0.05), 3 patients in group 1 required a redo operation because of paravalvular leakage or endocarditis (p > 0.05), the 30-day mortality rate was 1.6%. Overall the survival rate was 95% in group 1 and 97% in group 2 (mean follow-up, 294 days; range, 30 to 745 days).

Conclusion. The advantages of minimally invasive aortic valve operation include reduced trauma from incision and duration of ventilation, decreased blood loss and postoperative pain, the avoidance of groin cannulation, and a cosmetically attractive result. Simple equipment is used with a high degree of effectiveness and with no sacrifice of safety. Our study demonstrated the practicability and reliability of this new method.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Tabata, R. Umakanthan, L. H. Cohn, R. M. Bolman III, P. S. Shekar, F. Y. Chen, G. S. Couper, and S. F. Aranki
Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 537 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. Murtuza, J. R. Pepper, R. DeL Stanbridge, C. Jones, C. Rao, A. Darzi, and T. Athanasiou
Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement: Is It Worth It?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 1121 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
J. P. Greelish, R. M. Ahmad, J. M. Balaguer, M. R. Petracek, and J. G. Byrne
Reoperative Valve Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1159 - 1174.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Tabata, Z. Khalpey, S. F. Aranki, G. S. Couper, L. H. Cohn, and P. S. Shekar
Minimal Access Surgery of Ascending and Proximal Arch of the Aorta: A 9-Year Experience
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 84(1): 67 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Tabata, R. Umakanthan, Z. Khalpey, S. F. Aranki, G. S. Couper, L. H. Cohn, and P. S. Shekar
Conversion to full sternotomy during minimal-access cardiac surgery: Reasons and results during a 9.5-year experience
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2007; 134(1): 165 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
M. Tabata, S. F Aranki, J. A Fox, G. S Couper, L. H Cohn, and P. S Shekar
Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement in Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2007; 15(3): 225 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MMCTSHome page
M. Glauber, A. Farneti, M. Solinas, and J. Karimov
Aortic valve replacement through a right minithoracotomy
MMCTS, November 10, 2006; 2006(1110): 1826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
I. Bakir, F. P. Casselman, F. Wellens, H. Jeanmart, R. De Geest, I. Degrieck, F. Van Praet, Y. Vermeulen, and H. Vanermen
Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1599 - 1604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P J Devereaux, M. Bhandari, M. Clarke, V. M Montori, D. J Cook, S. Yusuf, D. L Sackett, C. S Cina, S D Walter, B. Haynes, et al.
Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials
BMJ, January 8, 2005; 330(7482): 88.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
J.-M. De Smet, B. Rondelet, J.-L. Jansens, M. Antoine, D. De Canniere, and J.-L. Le Clerc
Assessment Based on EuroSCORE of Ministernotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2004; 12(1): 53 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. C. Stamou, E. I. Kapetanakis, R. Lowery, K. A. Jablonski, T. L. Frankel, and P. J. Corso
Allogeneic blood transfusion requirements after minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a risk-Adjusted analysis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 76(4): 1101 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Sharony, E. A. Grossi, P. C. Saunders, C. F. Schwartz, G. H. Ribakove, A. T. Culliford, P. Ursomanno, F. G. Baumann, A. C. Galloway, and S. B. Colvin
Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery in the Elderly: A Case-Control Study
Circulation, September 9, 2003; 108(90101): II-43 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
M. De Bonis, F. Maisano, E. Lapenna, and O. Alfieri
Aortic and mitral valve surgery through a superior ministernotomy in pectus excavatum associated with Marfan's syndrome
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2003; 2(2): 146 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
J. G. Byrne, B. J. Phillips, and L. H. Cohn
Reoperative Valve Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1047 - 1056.
[Full Text]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
W. R. Chitwood Jr. and L. W. Nifong
Minimally Invasive and Robotic Valve Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1075 - 1092.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. Doll, M. A. Borger, J. Hain, J. Bucerius, T. Walther, J. F. Gummert, and F. W. Mohr
Minimal access aortic valve replacement: effects on morbidity and resource utilization
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 74(4): S1318 - 1322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Bonacchi, E. Prifti, G. Giunti, G. Frati, and G. Sani
Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 73(2): 460 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. Detter
Reply to Meharwal and Trehan
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 20(4): 895 - 896.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
I. Knez, R. Rienmuller, R. Maier, P. Rehak, B. Schrottner, H. Machler, M. Anelli-Monti, and B. Rigler
Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2001; 19(6): 797 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. Luo, C. Chang, and S. Chen
Ministernotomy versus full sternotomy in congenital heart defects: a prospective randomized study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 473 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. G. Byrne, A. N. Karavas, D. H. Adams, L. Aklog, S. F. Aranki, G. S. Couper, R. J. Rizzo, and L. H. Cohn
Partial upper re-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement or re-replacement after previous cardiac surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2000; 18(3): 282 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
W. Ehrlich, W. Skwara, W.-P. Klovekorn, M. Roth, and E. P. Bauer
Do patients want minimally invasive aortic valve replacement?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2000; 17(6): 714 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Massetti, G. Babatasi, E. Neri, and A. Khayat
Minimally invasive, but too many infections
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2000; 69(3): 977 - 978.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. E. Machler, P. Bergmann, and B. Rigler
Reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2000; 69(3): 978 - 978.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.