ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Jean-Marc Farinas
Michel Carrier
Raymond Cartier
Michel Pellerin
Louis P. Perrault
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farinas, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Pelletier, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farinas, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Pelletier, L. C.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:466-470
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles

Comparison of long-term clinical results of double versus single internal mammary artery bypass grafting

Jean-Marc Farinas, MDa, Michel Carrier, MDa, Yves Hébert, MDa, Raymond Cartier, MDa, Michel Pellerin, MDa, Louis P. Perrault, MD, PhDa, L. Conrad Pelletier, MDa

a Department of Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Accepted for publication July 10, 1998.

Address reprint requests to Dr Carrier, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Bélanger St E, Montreal, PQ H1T 1C8, Canada
e-mail: carrier{at}icm.umontreal.ca

Background. The long-term benefits of double versus single internal mammary artery (IMA) coronary bypass grafting have not yet been established.

Methods. Six hundred patients were studied retrospectively 10 years after coronary revascularization using saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) only or single or double IMA grafts.

Results. Patients with double IMA grafts were younger and were more likely to have diabetes, left main coronary stenosis, and three-vessel coronary artery disease than patients with SVGs or single IMA grafts. Patients with SVGs and double IMA grafts had a greater number of diseased coronary vessels and a greater number of coronary bypass grafts per patient than patients with single IMA grafts (mean ± SEM, 2.8 ± 1.0, 2.8 ± 0.7, 2.1 ± 0.8 grafts per patient, respectively, p < 0.0001). Actuarial survival rates 10 years after placement of SVGs and single and double IMA grafts averaged 83% ± 6%, 90% ± 4%, and 87% ± 8%, respectively (p = 0.03). Cox regression analysis showed that diabetes (relative risk, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.55 to 2.66) and chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (relative risk, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.58 to 3.80) increased, whereas an IMA graft on the left anterior descending coronary artery significantly decreased, the risk of death after operation (relative risk, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.57) throughout the follow-up period.

Conclusions. Use of an IMA graft on the left anterior descending coronary artery improves survival compared with use of an SVG. Although patients with double IMA grafts had a greater number of poor prognosis risk factors before operation, their 10-year survival rate was similar to that of patients with a single IMA graft.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
L.M. Stevens, M. Carrier, L.P. Perrault, Y. Hebert, R. Cartier, D. Bouchard, A. Fortier, and M. Pellerin
Influence of diabetes and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts on long-term outcome for multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 27(2): 281 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
U. Klima, H. MacVaugh III, E. Bagaev, M. Maringka, S. Kirschner, J. Beilner, and A. Haverich
Magnetic Vascular Port in Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11_suppl_1): II-55 - II-60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
L.M. Stevens, M. Carrier, L.P. Perrault, Y. Hebert, R. Cartier, D. Bouchard, A. Fortier, I. El-Hamamsy, and M. Pellerin
Single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts with concomitant saphenous vein grafts for multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: Effects on mortality and event-free survival
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2004; 127(5): 1408 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Tavilla, A. P. Kappetein, J. Braun, J. Gopie, A. T. J. Tjien, and R. A. E. Dion
Long-term follow-up of coronary artery bypass grafting in three-vessel disease using exclusively pedicled bilateral internal thoracic and right gastroepiploic arteries
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 77(3): 794 - 799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
G. Rizzoli, L. Schiavon, and P. Bellini
Does the use of bilateral internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts provide incremental benefit relative to the use of a single IMA graft? A meta-analysis approach
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2002; 22(5): 781 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.