HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Keith B. Allen William H. Warren Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Allen, K. B. Articles by Shaar, C. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Allen, K. B. Articles by Shaar, C. J.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:437-440
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original Articles

Pericardial effusion: subxiphoid pericardiostomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage

^a Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Lukes Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Accepted for publication July 3, 1998.

Address reprint requests to Dr Allen, 8333 Naab Rd, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46260

Background. Optimal management of cardiac tamponade resulting from pericardial effusion remains controversial.

Methods. Cardiac tamponade in 117 patients was treated with either subxiphoid pericardiostomy (n = 94) or percutaneous catheter drainage (n = 23). Percutaneous catheter drainage was used for patients with hemodynamic instability that precluded subxiphoid pericardiostomy. Effusions were malignant in 75 (64%) of 117 patients and benign in 42 (36%) of 117.

Results. Subxiphoid pericardiostomy had no operative deaths and a complication rate of 1.1% (1 of 94). In contrast, percutaneous drainage had significantly (p < 0.05) higher mortality and complication rates of 4% (1 of 23) and 17% (4 of 23), respectively. Patients with an underlying malignancy had a median survival of 2.2 months, with a 1-year actuarial survival rate of 13.8%. In comparison, patients with benign disease had a median survival of 42.8 months and a 1-, 2-, and 4-year actuarial survival rate of 79%, 73%, and 49%, respectively (p < 0.05). Effusions recurred in 1 (1.1%) of 94 patients after subxiphoid pericardiostomy compared with 7 (30.4%) of 23 patients with percutaneous drainage (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions. Benign and malignant pericardial tamponade can be safely and effectively managed with subxiphoid pericardiostomy. Percutaneous catheter drainage should be reserved for patients with hemodynamic instability.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Dosios, A. Stefanidis, C. Chatziantoniou, and S. Sgouropoulou Thorough Clinical Investigation of Low Cardiac Output Syndrome After Subxiphoid Pericardiostomy Angiology, September 1, 2007; 58(4): 483 - 486. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. K.H. O'Brien, J. C. Kucharczuk, M. B. Marshall, J. S. Friedberg, Z. Chen, L. R. Kaiser, and J. B. Shrager Comparative Study of Subxiphoid Versus Video-Thoracoscopic Pericardial "Window" Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 80(6): 2013 - 2019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Hanson Ask the Experts Crit. Care Nurse, October 1, 2005; 25(5): 68 - 69. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N Becit, Y Unlu, M Ceviz, C U Kocogullari, H Kocak, and Y Gurlertop Subxiphoid pericardiostomy in the management of pericardial effusions: case series analysis of 368 patients Heart, June 1, 2005; 91(6): 785 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Liberman, C. Labos, J. S. Sampalis, N. M. Sheiner, and D. S. Mulder Ten-Year Surgical Experience With Nontraumatic Pericardial Effusions: A Comparison Between the Subxyphoid and Transthoracic Approaches to Pericardial Window Arch Surg, February 1, 2005; 140(2): 191 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. Buchanan, V. V. Sullivan, R. Lampman, and M. G. Kulkarni Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 79(1): 387 - 387. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. B. Allen Subxiphoid Pericardiostomy Versus Percutaneous Extended Catheter Drainage Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 79(1): 386 - 387. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Alkadhi, S. Wildermuth, L. Desbiolles, T. Schertler, D. Crook, B. Marincek, and T. Boehm Vascular Emergencies of the Thorax after Blunt and Iatrogenic Trauma: Multi-Detector Row CT and Three-dimensional Imaging RadioGraphics, September 1, 2004; 24(5): 1239 - 1255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. McDonald, B. F. Meyers, T. J. Guthrie, R. J. Battafarano, J. D. Cooper, and G. A. Patterson Comparison of open subxiphoid pericardial drainage with percutaneous catheter drainage for symptomatic pericardial effusion Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2003; 76(3): 811 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. Buchanan, V. V. Sullivan, R. Lampman, and M. G. Kulkarni Pericardiocentesis with extended catheter drainage: an effective therapy Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2003; 76(3): 817 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Dosios, N. Theakos, D. Angouras, and P. Asimacopoulos Risk Factors Affecting the Survival of Patients With Pericardial Effusion Submitted to Subxiphoid Pericardiostomy Chest, July 1, 2003; 124(1): 242 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-J. Wang, K.-L. Hsu, F.-T. Chiang, C.-D. Tseng, Y.-Z. Tseng, and C.-S. Liau Technical and Prognostic Outcomes of Double-Balloon Pericardiotomy for Large Malignancy-Related Pericardial Effusions* Chest, September 1, 2002; 122(3): 893 - 899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]