ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Salim Walji
Richard J. Peterson
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walji, S.
Right arrow Articles by Benge, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walji, S.
Right arrow Articles by Benge, W.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:363-369
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles

Ultra–fast track hospital discharge using conventional cardiac surgical techniques1

Salim Walji, MDa, Richard J. Peterson, MDa, Pat Neis, RNa, Robert DuBroff, MDa, William A. Gray, MDa, William Benge, MDa

a Southwest Cardiology Associates, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Walji, 1101 Medical Arts Ave NE, Albuquerque, NM 87102

Presented at the Thirty-fourth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, New Orleans, LA, Jan 26–28, 1998.

Background. Recent introduction of minimally invasive adult cardiac surgical techniques has emphasized the advantage of early hospital discharge. However, we chose an alternative approach to determine the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of ultra–fast track protocols while retaining both standard surgical exposure (median sternotomy) and conventional cardiac surgical techniques (hypothermia, cardiopulmonary bypass with cardiac arrest, and optimal myocardial protection).

Methods. From September 1995 to January 1998, a total of 258 consecutive patients underwent cardiac procedures by a single surgeon. Acceleration of clinical pathways was used to initiate earlier discharges. Stringent postdischarge follow-up was implemented. Prospectively entered data were then analyzed retrospectively.

Results. A variety of isolated as well as combined coronary and valve procedures were performed. Of the 258 patients operated on during this entire study period, a total of 144 patients (56%) were discharged within postoperative days 1 to 4 (ultra–fast track discharge). Over the past 12 months, this incidence increased to 70% (76 of 108 patients). Approximately 50% of these patients were operated on urgently or emergently. To date, there have been no deaths in this ultra–fast track group. There were eight brief readmissions, of which one was for rewiring of a noninfected sternal dehiscence, and the remaining were for cardiac diagnostic studies or a noncardiac problem altogether.

Conclusions. Conventional cardiac operation can allow ultrafast hospital discharges while retaining the advantage of time-tested techniques and providing wider application without requiring new or additional training or equipment.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol Res NursHome page
R. A. DiMaria-Ghalili
Changes in Body Mass Index and Late Postoperative Outcomes in Elderly Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients: A Follow-up Study
Biol Res Nurs, July 1, 2004; 6(1): 24 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D. L. Ngaage
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: the myth, the logic and the science
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 24(4): 557 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol Res NursHome page
R. A. DiMaria-Ghalili
Changes in Nutritional Status and Postoperative Outcomes in Elderly CABG Patients
Biol Res Nurs, October 1, 2002; 4(2): 73 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
P. Gersbach, C. Imsand, L. K. von Segesser, A. Delabays, P. Vogt, and F. Stumpe
Beating heart coronary artery surgery: is sternotomy a suitable alternative to minimal invasive technique?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 20(4): 760 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. Ovrum, G. Tangen, C. Schiott, and S. Dragsund
Rapid recovery protocol applied to 5,658 consecutive ""on-pump"" coronary bypass patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2000; 70(6): 2008 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
F. R. Montes, S. I. Sanchez, J. C. Giraldo, J. D. Rincon, I. E. Rincon, M. V. Vanegas, and H. Charris
The Lack of Benefit of Tracheal Extubation in the Operating Room After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2000; 91(4): 776 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
M. Ghotbi and J. Ramsay
The Economics of Cardiac Fast Tracking
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, November 1, 1999; 3(4): 242 - 247.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. DuBroff, S. Walji, L. I. Bonchek, and D. J. Ullyot
Minimally Invasive Heart Surgery • Response
Circulation, June 8, 1999; 99 (22): 2967 - 2967.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.