ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
John E. Mayer, Jr
Brian W. Duncan
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, B. W.

Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1802-1804
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


How to Do It

Use of an Ultrasonic Scalpel as an Alternative to Electrocautery in Patients With Pacemakers

Michael R. Epstein, MDa, John E. Mayer, Jr, MDb, Brian W. Duncan, MDb

a Department of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
b Department of Cardiac Surgery, Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Accepted for publication December 15, 1997.

Address reprint requests to Dr Epstein, Department of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115-5737

We report the safe and effective use of an ultrasonically activated scalpel as an alternative to unipolar electrocautery during surgical procedures in 4 patients with pacemakers. This scalpel provided adequate hemostasis without the adverse consequences of electromagnetic interference. As the scalpel was able to easily cut through the silicone connector sleeve of one generator, it is not recommended for routine generator replacement because it may damage existing pacing leads. However, its use during nonpacemaker operations in patients with pacemakers should be considered.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Ozeren, O.V. Dogan, C. Duzgun, and E. Yucel
Use of an ultrasonic scalpel in the open-heart reoperation of a patient with pacemaker
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2002; 21(4): 761 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
C. D. Collard and S. C. Body
Anesthetic Implications for Patients With Permanent Pacemakers
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2000; 4(3): 144 - 151.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1998 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.