|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1559-1564
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center, St. Marys Health Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
b Department of Anesthesiology, St. Marys Health Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
c Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center at Christian Hospital Northeast, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Address reprint requests to Dr Fiore, Department of Surgery, St. Louis University Health Sciences Center, 3635 Vista at Grand Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63110-0250
Presented at the Forty-fourth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Naples, FL, Nov 68, 1997.
Background. The ideal temperature for blood cardioplegia administration remains controversial.
Methods. Fifty-two patients who required elective myocardial revascularization were prospectively randomized to receive intermittent antegrade tepid (29°C; group T, 25 patients) or cold (4°C; group C, 27 patients) blood cardioplegia.
Results. The two cohorts were similar with respect to all preoperative and intraoperative variables. The mean septal temperature was higher in group T (T, 29.6° ± 1.1°C versus 17.5° ± 3.0°C; p < 0.0001). After reperfusion, group T exhibited significantly greater lactate and acid release despite similar levels of oxygen extraction (p < 0.05). The creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme release was significantly lower in group T (764 ± 89 versus 1,120 ± 141 U · h/L; p < 0.04). Hearts protected with tepid cardioplegia demonstrated significantly increased ejection fraction with volume loading, improvement in left ventricular function at 12 hours, and decreased need for postoperative inotropic support (p < 0.05). The frequency of ventricular defibrillation after cross-clamp removal was lower in this cohort (p < 0.05). There were no hospital deaths, and both groups had similar postoperative courses.
Conclusions. Intermittent antegrade tepid blood cardioplegia is a safe and efficacious method of myocardial protection and demonstrates advantages when compared with cold blood cardioplegia in elective myocardial revascularization.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. L. Sloots, J. Vinten-Johansen, and G. P. Dobson Warm nondepolarizing adenosine and lidocaine cardioplegia: Continuous versus intermittent delivery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2007; 133(5): 1171 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ovrum, G. Tangen, S. Tollofsrud, R. Oystese, M. A. L. Ringdal, and R. Istad Cold blood cardioplegia versus cold crystalloid cardioplegia: A prospective randomized study of 1440 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2004; 128(6): 860 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Tan, S. Ahmed, and H. S Paterson Intermittent Tepid Blood Cardioplegia Improves Clinical Outcome Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2003; 11(2): 116 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-E. Falcoz, D. Kaili, S. Chocron, G. Toubin, M. Puyraveau, J.-F. Viel, and J.-P. Etievent Warm and tepid cardioplegia: Do they provide equal myocardial protection? Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 2156 - 2160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Paparella, T.M. Yau, and E. Young Cardiopulmonary bypass induced inflammation: pathophysiology and treatment. An update Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 232 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chocron, D. Kaili, Y. Yan, G. Toubin, L. Latini, F. Clement, J.-F. Viel, and J.-P. Etievent INTERMEDIATE LUKEWARM (20{degrees}C) ANTEGRADE INTERMITTENT BLOOD CARDIOPLEGIA COMPARED WITH COLD AND WARM BLOOD CARDIOPLEGIA J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2000; 119(3): 610 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |