ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mark D. Iannettoni
Angelo A. Vlessis
Richard I. Whyte
Mark B. Orringer
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iannettoni, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Orringer, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iannettoni, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Orringer, M. B.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1606-1609
© 1997 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: General Thoracic

Functional Outcome After Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Perforation

Mark D. Iannettoni, MD, Angelo A. Vlessis, MD, PhD, Richard I. Whyte, MD, Mark B. Orringer, MD

Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Background. The functional results after treatment of intrathoracic esophageal perforations have been poorly documented.

Methods. A retrospective review of 42 patients who underwent treatment of intrathoracic esophageal perforation associated with benign esophageal disease was performed.

Results. Of 42 patients treated for esophageal perforation, 25 underwent primary repair, 15 underwent esophagectomy and reconstruction, 1 underwent cervical esophagostomy and drainage followed by esophageal resection, and 1 had drainage alone followed by primary repair. Among the patients treated with primary repair, at least one additional operation was required in 13 patients. Of the 15 patients treated with esophagectomy and reconstruction, none required further operative treatment. Follow-up averaged 3.7 years, and of the 36 survivors available for follow-up, 18 (50%) required at least one esophageal dilation postoperatively, and 3 (8.3%) have required regular dilations. Subjectively, 19 of 36 patients (53%) indicate that their swallowing is better than before perforation, it was the same in 12 (33%), and worse in 4 (11%).

Conclusions. In conclusion, approximately one third of patients surviving primary repair of esophageal perforations have continued difficulty with swallowing, which often requires esophageal dilations or esophageal reconstructive procedures, or a combination of both. Optimal long-term results are achieved when primary repair is performed in patients with motor disorders or a "normal" esophagus. Esophagectomy is a better option in those patients with strictures or diffuse esophageal disease.


Related Article

Discussion
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1997 64: 1609-1610. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
N J Shaheen, J M Inadomi, B F Overholt, and P Sharma
What is the best management strategy for high grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus? A cost effectiveness analysis
Gut, December 1, 2004; 53(12): 1736 - 1744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. J. Brinster, S. Singhal, L. Lee, M. B. Marshall, L. R. Kaiser, and J. C. Kucharczuk
Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1475 - 1483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. Barkley, M. B. Orringer, M. D. Iannettoni, and J. Yee
Challenges in reversing esophageal discontinuity operations
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 76(4): 989 - 995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A.D. Muir, J. White, J.A. McGuigan, K.G. McManus, and A.N. Graham
Treatment and outcomes of oesophageal perforation in a tertiary referral centre
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2003; 23(5): 799 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. B. Zwischenberger, C. Savage, and A. Bidani
Surgical Aspects of Esophageal Disease . Perforation and Caustic Injury
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2002; 165(8): 1037 - 1040.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
F. V. DiPierro, T. W. Rice, M. M. DeCamp, L. A. Rybicki, and E. H. Blackstone
Esophagectomy and staged reconstruction
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2000; 17(6): 702 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. G. Guillem, H. L. Porte, A. Saudemont, P. A. Quandalle, and A. J. Wurtz
Perforation of Barrett's ulcer: a challenge in esophageal surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2000; 69(6): 1707 - 1710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1997 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.