ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
David A. Heimansohn
Robert J. Robison
John M. Paris, III
Robert G. Matheny
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heimansohn, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shaar, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heimansohn, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shaar, C. J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1231-1236
© 1997 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Routine Surveillance Endomyocardial Biopsy: Late Rejection After Heart Transplantation

David A. Heimansohn, MD, Robert J. Robison, MD, John M. Paris, III, MD, Robert G. Matheny, MD, JoAnne Bogdon, BN, Carl J. Shaar, PhD

Department of Cardiovascular/Thoracic Surgery, and Transplant Department, St. Vincent Hospital and Health Care Center, Indianapolis, Indiana

Background. Transplant programs use routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsies (RSEMB), which are performed at preset intervals to diagnose cardiac rejection. This retrospective study determined the incidence of graft rejection detected by RSEMB.

Methods. The records of 95 patients who underwent heart transplantation between 1987 and 1995 were reviewed. Rejection incidence was recorded for 80 patients who survived at least 30 days, with a mean follow-up of 35 months.

Results. One thousand five hundred sixteen total biopsies were performed; 1,170 were RSEMB. Four hundred seventy-five total rejection episodes occurred and 269 (56%) were diagnosed by RSEMB. Two distinct patient groups were identified. The majority (70 patients), had a decline in the incidence of rejection and no rejection episodes were identified by RSEMB after 36 months. In contrast, the high rejection group (10 patients) had a significantly higher ongoing rejection rate (p <= 0.04 to p <= 0.001) throughout their postoperative course up to 72 months.

Conclusions. The majority of our transplant patients demonstrate a decrease in rejection with time and do not require RSEMB beyond 30 months. We identified a group of patients who exhibited a higher rate of rejection and need continued RSEMB.


Related Articles

Routine Surveillance Endomyocardial Biopsy
Gulshan K. Sethi and Jack G. Copeland, III
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1997 64: 1230. [Extract] [Full Text]

Discussion
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1997 64: 1236. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. K. Sethi and J. G. Copeland III
Routine Surveillance Endomyocardial Biopsy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1997; 64(5): 1230 - 1230.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1997 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.