ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Robert H. Anderson
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, R. H.

Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:710-716
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: Cardiovascular

How Should We Optimally Describe Complex Congenitally Malformed Hearts?

Robert H. Anderson, MD

National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom

Accepted for publication April 15, 1996.

Background. There is still no agreement on how best to describe the arrangement of complex congenitally malformed hearts. Some favor a system using short coded segmental combinations. Others favor a more descriptive approach.

Methods and Results. I have reviewed my own experience in examining congenitally malformed hearts. This shows that it is possible to select in all such hearts the most constant anatomic components to define the morphology of the atrial and ventricular chambers and the arterial trunks. These components are the appendages for the atriums, the apical trabecular regions for the ventricles, and the branching pattern for the arterial trunks. Thereafter, it is possible in all hearts to base description on the fashion in which the chambers and trunks are or are not joined together, describing separately any pertinent additional morphologic features or abnormal relationships.

Conclusions. By using this simple descriptive approach, which owes nothing to concepts of development, it is possible to give a basic description of each heart, and predict the location of the conduction tissues, even if the heart in question has never previously been encountered.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1996 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.