HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Kevin Turley Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Turley, K. Articles by Tarnoff, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Turley, K. Articles by Tarnoff, H. Related Collections Related Article

Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:386-391
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Cardiovascular-Radical Outcome Method is Effective in Complex Congenital Cardiac Lesions

California Pacific Medical Center and Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, San Francisco, California

Background. The cardiovascular-radical outcome method is a proactive process of patient care that uses standard critical pathway methodology to reduce negative variation while encouraging positive variation to accelerate recovery. Its effectiveness in patients with complex congenital heart disease is explored.

Methods. Two hundred fourteen consecutive patients with congenital heart disease were cared for using the cardiovascular radical outcome method. Age ranged from 2 days to 19 years (median age, 3 years). Cardiovascular radical outcome method data were compared with the pathway plan data for each patient.

Results. Survival was 99% (211 patients) with an overall reduction in stay of 156 days (0.74 day/patient) (p < 0.0001). Only 10 patients (5%) exceeded the pathway plan; 201 (95%) reached the planned length of stay (critical pathway method), and 127 patients (60%) had a shorter length of stay than expected by the critical pathway method. One hundred forty-eight patients (70%), including 95 (64%) with more complex conditions, had a length of stay of 3 days and 18% achieved a 2-day length of stay, the maximal response. The process was most effective in the most complex groups, although preoperative comorbidities influenced outcomes. Outcome assessment demonstrated minimal morbidity and excellent family satisfaction.

Conclusions. The radical outcome method is effective in reducing the length of stay of patients with complex congenital heart disease. The power is in the process rather than the plan, and the method provides optimal patient care and family satisfaction.

Related Article

Discussion
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996 62: 391-392. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Turley Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2000; 69(3): 871 - 871. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Walji, R. J. Peterson, P. Neis, R. DuBroff, W. A. Gray, and W. Benge Ultra-fast track hospital discharge using conventional cardiac surgical techniques Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1999; 67(2): 363 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Ungerleider, A. R. Bengur, A. L. Kessenich, R. J. Liekweg, E. M. Hart, B. A. Rice, C. E. Miller, N. W. Lockwood, S. A. Knauss, J. Jaggers, et al. Risk Factors for Higher Cost in Congenital Heart Operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1997; 64(1): 44 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text]