HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Roland Hetzer Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Blome-Eberwein, S. A. Articles by Hetzer, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Blome-Eberwein, S. A. Articles by Hetzer, R.

Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:594-602
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original Article: Cardiovascular

Impact of Mechanical Heart Valve Prosthesis Sound on Patients' Quality of Life

Universitätsklinikum Rudolf Virchow, ENT Clinic and Polyclinic, Department of Audiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Accepted for publication September 19, 1995.

Background. The ``click'' sound of mechanical heart valve prostheses has been recognized as a disturbing factor for some patients after mechanical heart valve implantation. The factors determining the extent of disturbance remain controversial.

Methods. Ninety-five unmatched patients with six different valve types were examined (Duromedics-Edwards, Björk-Shiley, St. Jude Medical, Medtronic, CarboMedics, and Omnicarbon), including 12 patients with double-valve replacement. Three groups (Björk-Shiley, Duromedics-Edwards, and St. Jude Medical) were comparable in size. All patients were examined and interviewed, a hearing test was performed, and valve sounds were analyzed. Sound transmission was evaluated.

Results. The loudest valve was the Duromedics-Edwards prosthesis (mean, 84.2 dB[A] impulse) and the St. Jude Medical was the quietest (mean, 73.5 dB[A] impulse). This ranking was independent of patient variables and valve position. Discomfort level correlated with hearing loss and loudness of the valve. Patients desiring a quieter valve had better hearing, had louder valve sounds, felt disturbed by the sound, had partners who felt disturbed, and were receiving coumarin for anticoagulation. Sound was transmitted predominantly by air conduction. The frequency analysis to identify different valves was unsatisfactory, but louder frequencies did correspond with hearing-impaired patients' audiograms.

Conclusions. Our results emphasize the need for valve design changes, preoperative education about the sound, and inclusion of routine hearing tests into the preoperative workup.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Koertke, A. Hoffmann-Koch, D. Boethig, K. Minami, T. Breymann, M. El-Arousy, D. Seifert, and R. Koerfer Does the noise of mechanical heart valve prostheses affect quality of life as measured by the SF-36(R) questionnaire? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 24(1): 52 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. W. Emery, G. J. Van Nooten, and P. J. Tesar The initial experience with the ATS Medical mechanical cardiac valve prosthesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): 444 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Sezai, M. Shiono, Y. Orime, H. Hata, S. Yagi, N. Negishi, and Y. Sezai Evaluation of valve sound and its effects on ATS prosthetic valves in patients’ quality of life Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 69(2): 507 - 512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]