|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:48-57
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Clinic for Cardiac Surgery and Clinic of Internal Medicine, Cardiology, Triemli Hospital, and Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
Background. Pressure gradients calculated from echocardiography after aortic valve replacement are commonly much higher than would be expected from in vitro measurements.
Methods. The mean, peak-to-peak, and maximal gradients across bileaflet aortic prostheses (St. Jude Medical) were measured invasively in 52 patients at high and low heart rate, cardiac index, and stroke volume. One week after operation the gradients were calculated from a standard transthoracic echocardiogram (
p = 4v22). In a second study 3 to 12 months later, gradients were calculated using the standard, simplified Bernoulli equation, and with the equation considering subvalvular flow velocities (
p = 4(v22-v12)). Invasive and echocardiographic measurements were matched and compared.
Results. Invasively measured mean gradients for 21 to 29-mm valves ranged from 7.4 ± 4.9 to 4.3 ± 1.6 mm Hg at systolic flow rates from 11.3 ± 0.7 to 16.2 ± 1.8 Lmin-1m-2. Mean echocardiographic gradients were 15.1 ± 4.5 to 7.5 ± 2.2 mm Hg (p < 0.001) with the standard method, and 10.5 ± 1.9 to 5.6 ± 1.5 mm Hg when considering the subvalvular flow velocity (p < 0.001).
Conclusions. Mean gradients across bileaflet prostheses are generally low, even in small valves and with high systolic flow. The correlation of the invasive in vivo with in vitro gradients is good. Standard echocardiography overestimates gradients across bileaflet heart valves and high gradients are not due to valve dysfunction. Gradients obtained by echocardiography considering the subvalvular flow velocity correlate better to invasively measured and in vitro gradients.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Salehi, R. Sattarzadeh, A. A. Soleimani, H. Radmehr, J. Mirhosseini, and M. Sanatkar Far The Ross Operation: Clinical Results and Echocardiographic Findings Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, February 1, 2007; 15(1): 30 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Otero, J. L. Pomar, J. M. Revuelta, and J. J. Rufilanchas Comparative Evaluation of Small-Size Sorin Slimline and St. Jude HP Heart Valve Prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 79(4): 1284 - 1290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |