HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Laman A. Gray, Jr Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Santamore, W. P. Articles by Gray, L. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Santamore, W. P. Articles by Gray, L. A., Jr

Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:350-356
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Univentricular Versus Biventricular Support

Left Ventricular Contributions to Right Ventricular Systolic Function During LVAD Support

Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky

Abstract

Background. In patients with postcardiotomy low cardiac output syndromes, right ventricular (RV) failure develops in approximately 25% of patients receiving left ventricular (LV) assist device support. Depressed RV function have been attributed to abnormalities of the RV myocardium, excessive load imposed on the RV during systole or diastole, or obstruction to RV inflow. However, recent studies also suggest that LV function may significantly affect RV function through ventricular interdependence.

Methods. We reviewed the data showing the importance of systolic ventricular interaction. We then related these observations to the RV response during LV assist device support, and present our ideas regarding the mechanisms responsible for this RV failure.

Results. Using an electrically isolated right heart preparation, Damiano observed double-peaked waveforms for RV pressure, and pulmonary artery blood flow occurred over a wide range (0 to 300 ms) of pacing intervals between the LV and RV. Numeric analysis indicated that RV systolic pressure and pulmonary artery blood flow were composed of both RV and LV components, with the LV component dominating (63.5% versus 36.5%).

Conclusions. The experimental studies indicate a very consistent RV response during LV assist device support: a decrease in RV afterload, increased compliance, and decreased contractility. In normal hearts, the net effect is an increase or no change in cardiac output. With a preexisting pathologic condition, the RV responses is qualitatively the same, but anatomic ventricular interaction is accentuated, leading to a greater decrease in RV contractility. The net effect is a decrease in cardiac output, which may require inotropic or RV mechanical support.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Aggarwal, F. Cheema, M. C. Oz, and Y. Naka Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1609 - 1628. [Full Text]

				M. E. Stone Current Status of Mechanical Circulatory Assistance Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2007; 11(3): 185 - 204. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Chumnanvej, M. J. Wood, T. E. MacGillivray, and M. F. V. Melo Perioperative Echocardiographic Examination for Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2007; 105(3): 583 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Santambrogio, T. Bianchi, M. Fuardo, F. Gazzoli, R. Veronesi, A. Braschi, and M. Maurelli Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device insertion: preoperative risk factors Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2006; 5(4): 379 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O.H. Frazier, T. J. Myers, and I. Gregoric Biventricular assistance with the Jarvik FlowMaker: A case report J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2004; 128(4): 625 - 626. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Nordhaug, T. Steensrud, S. Muller, K. V. Husnes, and T. Myrmel Intraaortic Balloon Pumping Improves Hemodynamics and Right Ventricular Efficiency in Acute Ischemic Right Ventricular Failure Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2004; 78(4): 1426 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Aaronson, H. Patel, and F. D. Pagani Patient selection for left ventricular assist device therapy Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 75(90060): S29 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Stone, W. Soong, M. Krol, and D. L. Reich The Anesthetic Considerations in Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices Presenting for Noncardiac Surgery: A Review of Eight Cases Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2002; 95(1): 42 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Y. Schure, P. C. Laussen, and F. X. McGowan JR Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support of Infants and Children With Congenital Heart Disease Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2001; 5(1): 46 - 54. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Chinchoy, C. L. Soule, A. J. Houlton, W. J. Gallagher, M. A. Hjelle, T. G. Laske, J. Morissette, and P. A. Iaizzo Isolated four-chamber working swine heart model Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2000; 70(5): 1607 - 1614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R. Trumble, C. S. Park, and J. A. Magovern Copulsation Balloon for Right Ventricular Assistance : Preliminary Trials Circulation, June 1, 1999; 99(21): 2815 - 2818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]