HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Alain Pavie Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pavie, A. Articles by Leger, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pavie, A. Articles by Leger, P.

Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:347-349
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Univentricular Versus Biventricular Support

Physiology of Univentricular Versus Biventricular Support

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, La Pitie Hospital, Paris, France

Abstract

Right ventricular failure unresponsive to pharmacologic treatment occurs in approximately 20% to 30% of patients supported with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). The effect of the assistance on right ventricular function is highly controversial. Increased venous return produced by an LVAD can affect right ventricular function by increasing preload. On the other hand, an LVAD can improve the filling of the right ventricle by unloading the left ventricle, reducing its chamber size and shifting the septum back to the left. Right ventricular function is highly afterload dependent, the ventricular function depending on the pulmonary vascular resistance. With a normal pulmonary vascular bed, the LVAD can improve right ventricular function by reducing right ventricular afterload. If there is a fixed high pulmonary pressure, however, the LVAD can increase right ventricular afterload and volume. We conclude that the right ventricle is dispensable if the pulmonary vascular bed is normal.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. E. Stone Current Status of Mechanical Circulatory Assistance Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2007; 11(3): 185 - 204. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Winterhalter, S. Fischer, R. Tessmann, A. Goerler, S. Piepenbrock, A. Haverich, and M. Strueber Using inhaled iloprost to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass after implanting a left ventricular assist device. Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2006; 103(2): 515 - 516. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Nordhaug, T. Steensrud, S. Muller, K. V. Husnes, and T. Myrmel Intraaortic Balloon Pumping Improves Hemodynamics and Right Ventricular Efficiency in Acute Ischemic Right Ventricular Failure Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2004; 78(4): 1426 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Aaronson, H. Patel, and F. D. Pagani Patient selection for left ventricular assist device therapy Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 75(90060): S29 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Stone, W. Soong, M. Krol, and D. L. Reich The Anesthetic Considerations in Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices Presenting for Noncardiac Surgery: A Review of Eight Cases Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2002; 95(1): 42 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Y. Schure, P. C. Laussen, and F. X. McGowan JR Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support of Infants and Children With Congenital Heart Disease Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2001; 5(1): 46 - 54. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A K Mahmood, J M Courtney, S Westaby, M Akdis, and H Reul Critical review of current left ventricular assist devices Perfusion, September 1, 2000; 15(5): 399 - 420. [PDF]

				D. R. Trumble, C. S. Park, and J. A. Magovern Copulsation Balloon for Right Ventricular Assistance : Preliminary Trials Circulation, June 1, 1999; 99(21): 2815 - 2818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]