ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Carlos Blanche
Alfredo Trento
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blanche, C.
Right arrow Articles by Trento, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blanche, C.
Right arrow Articles by Trento, A.

Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1263-1266
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Permanent Pacemaker for Rejection Episodes After Heart Transplantation: A Poor Prognostic Sign

Carlos Blanche, MD, Lawrence S. C. Czer, MD, Michael C. Fishbein, MD, Johanna J. M. Takkenberg, MD, Alfredo Trento, MD

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

Accepted for publication June 12, 1995.

Background. The development of arrhythmias early or late after heart transplantation has been associated with acute and chronic rejection. This study aims to document the importance of this relationship and its value as a prognostic sign in those patients who required a permanent pacemaker for rejection episodes.

Methods. A retrospective analysis of 158 orthotopic heart transplantations performed in 157 patients between December 1988 and April 1995 was done. The clinical course and the outcome of 6 patients who underwent insertion of a permanent pacemaker for bradyarrhythmias caused by acute or chronic allograft rejection were compared with the course and outcome of 9 patients who had pacemaker placement as a result of sinus node dysfunction not associated with rejection.

Results. The mortality rate was 100% for patients whose indication for permanent pacing was severe acute or chronic rejection. Conversely, 8 of the 9 patients who underwent pacemaker placement for sinus node dysfunction not associated with rejection are long-term survivors; the one late death was due to a noncardiac cause.

Conclusions. We observed a strong relationship between bradyarrhythmias requiring a permanent pacemaker and severe acute or chronic allograft rejection. This association suggests a poor prognosis and indicates that these patients should be managed aggressively. Such management includes close immunologic surveillance for cellular and humoral rejection, increased frequency of endomyocardial biopsies and coronary angiography, and early consideration for retransplantation.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1995 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.