ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
W. R. Eric Jamieson
Robert T. Miyagishima
Peter Allen
G. Frank O. Tyers
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jamieson, W. R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tyers, G. F. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jamieson, W. R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tyers, G. F. O.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:999-1006
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Carpentier-Edwards Standard Porcine Bioprosthesis: Clinical Performance to Seventeen Years

W. R. Eric Jamieson, MD, A. Ian Munro, MD, Robert T. Miyagishima, MD, Peter Allen, MD, Lawrence H. Burr, MD, G. Frank O. Tyers, MD

St. Paul's Hospital and Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Background. The role of porcine bioprostheses in cardiac valve replacement has been under review for several years. The literature deals primarily with age as a determinant of durability, as well as the intermediate-term performance of various prostheses. The performance of the Carpentier-Edwards first-generation standard porcine bioprosthesis is presented over the long-term with further documentation on age determinants.

Methods. The ``Guidelines for Reporting Morbidity and Mortality After Cardiac Valvular Operations'' were used for definitions of valve-related complications, categorization, and statistical methods. The valve-related complications were evaluated in a time-related manner by actuarial life-table techniques. The Lee-Desu statistic test was used for comparison of performance by valve positions and age groups. Hazard function rates were demonstrated for complications and composites.

Results. Of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses implanted in 1,195 patients (1,214 operations, 1,315 valves) commencing in 1975 the early mortality was 7.6% (92). The early mortality without concomitant procedures was 6.1% and with 11.7%. The late mortality was 5.3% per patient-year; 4.6% patient-year without and 7.5% per patient-year with concomitant procedures. The valve-related causes of late mortality (131) were thromboembolism (41), antithromboembolic hemorrhage (14), prosthetic valve endocarditis (20), nonstructural dysfunction (12), and structural valve deterioration (44). The valve-related deaths (early, 7; late, 124) were 21.2% of the total 617 total deaths. Reoperation for valve-related complications was performed in 406 patients (4.1% per patient-year), of which 327 were for structural valve deterioration (3.3% per patient-year). Mortality for reoperation was 0.5% per patient-year (49 patients) or 12.1%. Of the 49 deaths, 33 were caused by structural valve deterioration. The linearized occurrence rate for thromboembolism was 1.6% per patient-year (major, 0.9% per patient-year, and minor, 0.7% per patient-year). The fatal thromboembolic rate was 0.4% per patient-year (41), undifferentiated by valve position. The freedom from thromboembolism was 76% at 17 years (p = not significant by valve position) (major, 87%; fatal, 93%). The freedom from prosthetic valve endocarditis was 92% at 17 years (p = not significant by valve position). The freedom from reoperation, at 15 years, was 38%: aortic (AVR), 55%; mitral (MVR), 20%; and multiple valve replacement (MR), 24% (p < 0.05 AVR > MVR, MR). The freedom from structural valve deterioration, at 15 years, was 41%; AVR, 58%; MVR, 21%; MR, 36% (p < 0.05 AVR > MVR, MR). The freedom from structural valve deterioration was greater for advancing age groups (p < 0.05); AVR >= 70 years 96% at 12 years, and 65 to 69 years 94% at 12 years and 82% at 15 years; MVR >= 70 years 85% at 12 years, and 65 to 69 years 54% at 12 years. The freedom from valve-related mortality was 73% at 17 years: AVR, 80%; MVR, 61%; and MR, 67% (p < 0.05 AVR > MVR, MR). The freedom from valve-related residual morbidity was 94% (p = not significant by valve position).

Conclusions. The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis continues to provide satisfactory clinical performance to 17 years. Thromboembolism is a more serious problem than structural failure: 92 major thromboembolic events with 41 fatalities compared with 44 fatalities of which 33 occurred with reoperation. The prosthesis is especially recommended for patients more than 65 years of age for AVR and more than 70 years of age for MVR.


Related Article

Discussion
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1995 60: 1007. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
J. P. Greelish, R. M. Ahmad, J. M. Balaguer, M. R. Petracek, and J. G. Byrne
Reoperative Valve Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1159 - 1174.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
K. Hayashida, K. Kanda, H. Yaku, J. Ando, and Y. Nakayama
Development of an in vivo tissue-engineered, autologous heart valve (the biovalve): Preparation of a prototype model
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2007; 134(1): 152 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F.-C. Riess, R. Bader, E. Cramer, L. Hansen, B. Kleijnen, G. Wahl, J. Wallrath, S. Winkel, and N. Bleese
Hemodynamic Performance of the Medtronic Mosaic Porcine Bioprosthesis Up to Ten Years
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4): 1310 - 1318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
Are allografts the biologic valve of choice for aortic valve replacement in nonelderly patients? Comparison of explantation for structural valve deterioration of allograft and pericardial prostheses.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2006; 131(3): 558 - 564.e4.



Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. Totaro, N. Degno, A. Zaidi, A. Youhana, and V. Argano
Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis: A stented valve with stentless performance?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2005; 130(6): 1668 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Zegdi, M. Debieche, C. Latremouille, D. Lebied, C. Chardigny, J.-M. Grinda, S. Chauvaud, A. Deloche, A. Carpentier, and J.-N. Fabiani
Long-Term Results of Mitral Valve Repair in Active Endocarditis
Circulation, May 17, 2005; 111(19): 2532 - 2536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. J. Schoen and R. J. Levy
Calcification of Tissue Heart Valve Substitutes: Progress Toward Understanding and Prevention
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 1072 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J P A Puvimanasinghe, J J M Takkenberg, M B Edwards, M J C Eijkemans, E W Steyerberg, L A van Herwerden, K M Taylor, G L Grunkemeier, J D F Habbema, and A J J C Bogers
Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation
Heart, October 1, 2004; 90(10): 1172 - 1178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. Gao, Y. Wu, G. L. Grunkemeier, A. P. Furnary, and A. Starr
Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 384 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. W. Jamieson and M. M. Madani
The choice of valve protheses
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 389 - 390.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
W. Mistiaen, Ph. Van Cauwelaert, Ph. Muylaert, S. U. Sys, F. Harrisson, and H. Bortier
Thromboembolic events after aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with a Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2004; 127(4): 1166 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
H.-Y. Yu, Y.-L. Ho, S.-H. Chu, Y.-S. Chen, S.-S. Wang, and F.-Y. Lin
Long-term evaluation of Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis for rheumatic heart disease
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2003; 126(1): 80 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M.-B. Edwards and K. M. Taylor
Outcomes in nonagenarians after heart valve replacement operation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 75(3): 830 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
J. G. Byrne, B. J. Phillips, and L. H. Cohn
Reoperative Valve Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1047 - 1056.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Murtra
The adventure of cardiac surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 167 - 180.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. Santini, G. B. Luciani, S. Restivo, G. Casali, R. Pessotto, P. Bertolini, A. Rossi, and A. Mazzucco
Over twenty-year follow-up of the standard Hancock porcine bioprosthesis implanted in the mitral position
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71 (2007): S232 - S235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. F. Pupello, L. N. Bessone, E. Lopez, J. C. Brock, M. J. Alkire, E. G. Izzo, G. Sanabria, D. P. Sims, and G. Ebra
Long-term results of the bioprosthesis in elderly patients: impact on quality of life
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71 (2007): S244 - S248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. P. A. Puvimanasinghe, E. W. Steyerberg, J. J. M. Takkenberg, M. J. C. Eijkemans, L. A van Herwerden, A. J. J. C. Bogers, and J. D. F. Habbema
Prognosis After Aortic Valve Replacement With a Bioprosthesis : Predictions Based on Meta-Analysis and Microsimulation
Circulation, March 20, 2001; 103(11): 1535 - 1541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Vrandecic, F. A. Fantini, B. G. Filho, O. C. de Oliveira, I. M. da Costa Junior, and E. Vrandecic
Retrospective clinical analysis of stented vs. stentless porcine aortic bioprostheses
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2000; 18(1): 46 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
P. R. Vogt, H.-P. Brunner-LaRocca, P. Sidler, G. Zund, K. Truniger, M. Lachat, J. Turina, and M. I. Turina
Reoperative surgery for degenerated aortic bioprostheses: predictors for emergency surgery and reoperative mortality
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 17(2): 134 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
O. Lund, H. K. Pilegaard, L. B. Ilkjaer, S. L. Nielsen, and H. Arildsen
Performance profile of the Starr-Edwards aortic cloth covered valve, track valve, and silastic ball valve
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 1999; 16(4): 403 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W.R. E. Jamieson, L. H. Burr, M. T. Janusz, A. I. Munro, R. I. Hayden, R. T. Miyagishima, H. Ling, G. J. Fradet, S. V. Lichtenstein, and K. M. Stewart
Carpentier-Edwards standard and supraannular porcine bioprostheses: comparison of technology
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1999; 67(1): 10 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
F. Isobe and Y. Kawashima
The outcome and indications of the Cox maze III procedure for chronic atrial fibrillation with mitral valve disease
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1998; 116(2): 220 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
S. F. Katircioglu, B. Yamak, T. Ulus, L. Birincioglu, A. Saritas, O. Tasdemir, and K. Bayazit
Mitral Valve Replacement with Bioprosthesis in Age Group Fifty to Sixty-Five Years
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 1998; 6(1): 23 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. A. Salles, E. Buffolo, J. C. Andrade, J. H. Palma, R. R.P. Silva, R. Santiago, I. S. Casagrande, and M. C. V. Moreira
Mitral valve replacement with glutaraldehyde preserved aortic allografts
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 1998; 13(2): 135 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. I. Fann, D. C. Miller, KathleenA. Moore, R. S. Mitchell, P. E. Oyer, E. B. Stinson, R. C. Robbins, B. A. Reitz, and N. E. Shumway
Twenty-Year Clinical Experience With Porcine Bioprostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1996; 62(5): 1301 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1995 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.