|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1048-1052
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Departments of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiac Radiology, University of Bristol and Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom
Accepted for publication April 29, 1995.
Background. The well-known correlation between prosthetic valve orifice area and transvalvular gradients has raised concerns about the presence of significant residual gradients when the size of the prosthesis that can be implanted is limited by the presence of a small aortic annulus.
Methods. Dobutamine-stress Doppler echocardiography was used to evaluate the hemodynamic performance of small CarboMedics aortic prostheses (19 mm and 21 mm) in 18 patients (16 women; mean age, 64 years) who had undergone aortic valve replacement 23.5 ± 19 months (standard deviation) previously. Dobutamine infusion was started at a rate of 5 µg kg-1 min-2 and increased to 10 and 20 µg kg-1 min-2 at 15-minute intervals. Pulsed and continuous wave Doppler studies were performed at rest and at the end of each stage. Effective orifice area, performance index, and discharge coefficient of both valves were calculated, and peak and mean velocity and pressure drop across the prostheses were measured.
Results. Heart rate and cardiac output increased by 74% and 94%, respectively, and mean arterial blood pressure decreased by 9% at maximum stress. Effective orifice area, discharge coefficient, and performance index were comparable in both valve sizes at rest and maximum stress. Also, there was no significant difference in mean transvalvular pressure drop (gradient) for 19-mm and 21-mm prostheses at rest (8.1 ± 8.4 and 4.8 ± 3.8 mm Hg) or maximum stress (15.1 ± 14.2 and 8.8 ± 5.8 mm Hg, respectively). No significant correlation could be demonstrated between transvalvular pressure drop and patient's body surface area.
Conclusions. These data show that 19-mm and 21-mm CarboMedics aortic prostheses exhibit equally favorable hemodynamic performance with minimal pressure gradient, both at rest and under stress conditions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. R. Rezaian, K. Aghasadeghi, and J. Kojuri Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Performance of St.Jude Mitral Prostheses: A Pilot Study by Dobutamine-Stress Doppler Echocardiography Angiology, January 1, 2005; 56(1): 81 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kadir, C. Walsh, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini Comparison of exercise and dobutamine echocardiography in the haemodynamic assessment of small size mechanical aortic valve prostheses Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2002; 21(4): 692 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kadir, I. Y.P. Wan, C. Walsh, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini Hemodynamic performance of the 21-mm Sorin Bicarbon mechanical aortic prostheses using dobutamine Doppler echocardiography Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2001; 72(1): 49 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Knez, R. Rienmuller, R. Maier, P. Rehak, B. Schrottner, H. Machler, M. Anelli-Monti, and B. Rigler Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2001; 19(6): 797 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Maslow, J. M. Haering, S. Heindel, J. Mashikian, R. Levine, and P. Douglas An Evaluation of Prosthetic Aortic Valves Using Transesophageal Echocardiography: The Double-Envelope Technique Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2000; 91(3): 509 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Izzat, I. Kadir, B. Reeves, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini Patient-prosthesis mismatch is negligible with modern small-size aortic valve prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 68(5): 1657 - 1660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Cam, H. Gercekoglu, S. Celik, M. Gursurer, G. Tayyareci, H. Karabulut, A. Narin, T. Tezel, and B. Yigiter Dobutamine Stress Test to Evaluate Different Sizes of Prosthetic Aortic Valves Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1998; 6(3): 166 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-F. Obadia, Y. A. Martelloni, O. H. Bastien, G. M. Durand de Gevigney, and J.-F. Chassignolle Long-Term Follow-up of Small (Size 20 and 21) Medtronic-Hall Aortic Valve Prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1997; 64(2): 421 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Izzat and A. P. C. Yim Assessment of the hemodynamic performance of small-size aortic valve prostheses J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1997; 113(6): 1121 - 1122. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Gonzalez-Juanatey Assessment of the hemodynamic performance of small-size aortic valve prostheses J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1997; 113(6): 1122 - 1123. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kadir, M. B. Izzat, P. Wilde, B. Reeves, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini Dynamic Evaluation of the 21-mm Medtronic Intact Aortic Bioprosthesis by Dobutamine Echocardiography Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1997; 63(4): 1128 - 1132. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Carrel, U. Zingg, R. Jenni, B. Aeschbacher, and M. I. Turina Early In Vivo Experience With the Hemodynamic Plus St. Jude Medical Heart Valves in Patients With Narrowed Aortic Annulus Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1996; 61(5): 1418 - 1422. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Izzat, M. Caputo, and G. D. Angelini Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Performance of Stentless Porcine Aortic Valves Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1995; 60(5): 1461 - 1461. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |