ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Jean-Marie Collard
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collard, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Kestens, P.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collard, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Kestens, P.-J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:261-266
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: General Thoracic

Esophageal Replacement: Gastric Tube or Whole Stomach?

Jean-Marie Collard, MD, Nicolas Tinton, MD, Jacques Malaise, MD, Renato Romagnoli, MD, Jean-Bernard Otte, MD, Paul-Jacques Kestens, MD

Department of Surgery, Louvain Medical School, Brussels, Belgium

Background. The stomach can be used either in its entirety or as a greater curvature tube for esophageal replacement.

Methods. The study compares the gastric tube (group A; n = 112) to the whole stomach whose lesser curvature is denuded (group B; n = 100) in terms of technical complication and alimentary comfort. The clinical results are substantiated by assessment of the eating performance of patients and control subjects at a test meal, measurement of the gastric dimensions before and after both tailoring procedures, and intraarterial staining of the gastric wall.

Results. Major differences between the two groups are cervical anastomosis stenoses (22.3% versus 6% [A versus B]; p = 0.008), fistulas (7.9% versus 1%; p = 0.0209), number of meals and snacks per day (4.6 versus 4; p = 0.0275), sensation of early fullness at meals (52.4% versus 17.8%; p < 0.0001), ratings given to the long-term alimentary comfort (presymptomatic condition = 10 points) (7.6 versus 8.8 out of 10 on average; p < 0.0001), and calories consumed in 1 minute at a test meal (59% [p < 0.05] versus 77% of those consumed by control subjects). The volume of the stomach is reduced by a range of 21.4% to 47.2% after tubulization (group A) whereas it increases by a range of 4.9% to 17.4% after denudation of the lesser curve (group B). Intraarterial staining of the gastric wall reveals the poor vascularity of the upper-most segment of the greater curve.

Conclusion. Slight increase of the gastric capacity and maintenance of the submucosal vascular network account for the better results achieved with the whole stomach.


Related Article

Discussion
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1995 60: 267. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. C.-F. Lin, H. Russell, and M. K. Ferguson
Strangulation of the Reconstructive Gastric Tube by the Azygos Arch
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 82(2): e8 - e10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. De Giacomo, F. Francioni, F. Venuta, P. Trentino, M. Moretti, E. A. Rendina, and G. F. Coloni
Complete mechanical cervical anastomosis using a narrow gastric tube after esophagectomy for cancer
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 26(5): 881 - 884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. A. Gutschow, J.-M. Collard, R. Romagnoli, J.-M. Michel, M. Salizzoni, and A. H. Holscher
Bile exposure of the denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2001; 71(6): 1786 - 1791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. M. Young, C. Deschamps, V. F. Trastek, M. S. Allen, D. L. Miller, C. D. Schleck, and P. C. Pairolero
Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease: early morbidity, mortality, and functional results
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2000; 70(5): 1651 - 1655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J.-M. Collard, P.-F. Laterre, F. Boemer, M. Reynaert, and R. Ponlot
Conservative Treatment of Postsurgical Lymphatic Leaks With Somatostatin-14
Chest, March 1, 2000; 117(3): 902 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. B. Orringer, B. Marshall, and M. D. Iannettoni
ELIMINATING THE CERVICAL ESOPHAGOGASTRIC ANASTOMOTIC LEAK WITH A SIDE-TO-SIDE STAPLED ANASTOMOSIS
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2000; 119(2): 277 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J.-M. Collard, R. Romagnoli, L. Goncette, J.-B. Otte, and P.-J. Kestens
Terminalized Semimechanical Side-to-Side Suture Technique for Cervical Esophagogastrostomy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1998; 65(3): 814 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. Thomas, P. Fuentes, R. Giudicelli, and E. Reboud
Colon Interposition for Esophageal Replacement: Current Indications and Long-Term Function
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1997; 64(3): 757 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1995 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.