ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Robert H. Anderson
Benson R. Wilcox
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, B. R.

Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:1366-1375
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Herbert Sloan Lecture

Understanding Cardiac Anatomy: The Prerequisite for Optimal Cardiac Surgery

Robert H. Anderson, MD, Benson R. Wilcox, MD

Department of Paediatrics, National Heart & Lung Institute, London, England, and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Abstract

If advances in cardiac surgery are to continue into the twenty-first century, it will be necessary to concentrate on details of matters such as the anatomy of the heart. This will be achieved best when anatomy is described as it is observed. This approach is obscured when words are used in inappropriate fashion, or else assigned a function separate from their everyday meaning. Examples of how the congenitally malformed heart and the normal heart have been described in the past are examined within the framework of using words in their vernacular meaning. Suggestions are made to improve descriptions and understanding for the 21st century. Using the example of the ``univentricular heart'', it is shown how conventions debarring ventricular status to discrete chambers within the ventricular mass are, of necessity, artificial. Similar examples are used to distinguish septal from parietal structures within the heart and to elucidate the structure of some congenital malformations. For valves, it is shown how proper description requires assessment of these structures in their closed as well as their open positions. Understanding of cardiac anatomy, truly a prerequisite for successful cardiac surgery, will be facilitated in future if words are used in their generally accepted sense, and if artificial conventions are avoided.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MMCTSHome page
R. H. Anderson and M. Kanani
Mitral valve repair: critical analysis of the anatomy discussed
MMCTS, February 19, 2007; 2007(0219): 2147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. H. Anderson and B. R. Wilcox
Reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2000; 69(6): 1990 - 1990.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. H. Anderson
How Should We Optimally Describe Complex Congenitally Malformed Hearts?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1996; 62(3): 710 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1995 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.