ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by He, G.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Starr, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by He, G.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Starr, A.

Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:1056-1062
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Up to Thirty-Year Survival After Aortic Valve Replacement in the Small Aortic Root

Guo-Wei He, MD, PhD, Gary L. Grunkemeier, PhD, Hugh L. Gately, MD, Anthony P. Furnary, MD, Albert Starr, MD

The Albert Starr Academic Center for Cardiac Surgery, St. Vincent Hospital and Medical Center, Portland, Oregon

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) in the small aortic root has been reported to be associated with obstruction of left ventricular output. This study was designed to investigate the determinants of long-term survival after the implantation of small size prostheses. From September 1961 to December 1993, 2,977 patients underwent isolated aortic valve replacement at our institution. Of these patients, 447 who were older than 18 years received small size (21 mm or less) prostheses. Long-term survival was investigated in the 404 patients who survived operation (more than 30 days) with 92% follow-up completeness (mean ± deviation 7.1 ± 6.4; maximum, 31 years). The age was younger than 50 years in 62 patients, 50 to 59 years in 60, 60 to 69 years in 99, 70 to 79 years in 138, and 80 to 94 years in 45; 67% were men. Thirty patients (7%) had previous AVR. Prosthesis usage included early Starr-Edwards models in 130 (32%), current Starr-Edwards (model 1260 since 1969) in 50 (12%), Carpentier-Edwards (porcine) in 113 (28%), and other prostheses in 111 patients (27%). One hundred sixteen patients (26%) had concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Eleven variables (age divided as above, sex, preoperative functional class, body surface area [BSA], small BSA [less than 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, or 1.9 m2], period of operation, previous AVR, type of prosthesis, size of prosthesis, concomitant CABG, and re-replacement) were investigated with regard to the long-term survival by the Kaplan-Meier method, and age, concomitant CABG, and type of prosthesis were significant. Multivariable analyses (Cox proportional hazard regression) were performed for the whole group as well as subsets of patients. The multivariable analyses reveal that concomitant CABG and age are independent variables to determine the long-term survival. In the subgroup of patients without concomitant CABG, age was the only independent variable found to determine long-term survival and in the subgroup of the patients with concomitant CABG, BSA less than 1.7 m2 is the only independent variable. We conclude that patients with small aortic root and small BSA may have satisfactory long-term results after isolated AVR and that old age and concomitant CABG are the risk factors for long-term survival in those patients. However, mismatch between body size and prosthesis size is a negative determinant for long-term survival in the subgroup of patients who receive small size of prostheses with concomitant CABG.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. Mihaljevic, E. R. Nowicki, J. Rajeswaran, E. H. Blackstone, L. Lagazzi, J. Thomas, B. W. Lytle, and D. M. Cosgrove
Survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis: Implications for decision making.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2008; 135(6): 1270 - 1279.e12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. L. Svennevig, M. Abdelnoor, and S. Nitter-Hauge
Twenty-Five Year Experience With the Medtronic-Hall Valve Prosthesis in the Aortic Position: A Follow-Up Cohort Study of 816 Consecutive Patients
Circulation, October 16, 2007; 116(16): 1795 - 1800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. Dunning, R.J. Graham, J. Thambyrajah, M.J. Stewart, S.W.H. Kendall, and S. Hunter
Stentless vs. stented aortic valve bioprostheses: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2007; 28(19): 2369 - 2374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. Kunadian, K. Vijayalakshmi, A. R. Thornley, M. A. de Belder, S. Hunter, S. Kendall, R. Graham, M. Stewart, J. Thambyrajah, and J. Dunning
Meta-Analysis of Valve Hemodynamics and Left Ventricular Mass Regression for Stentless Versus Stented Aortic Valves
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 84(1): 73 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Ali, J. C. Halstead, F. Cafferty, L. Sharples, F. Rose, E. Lee, R. Rusk, J. Dunning, V. Argano, and S. Tsui
Early Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes After Stented and Stentless Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 83(6): 2162 - 2168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
K. St. Rammos, D. G. Ketikoglou, G. J. Koullias, S. G. Tsomkopoulos, C. K. Rammos, and N. P. Argyrakis
The Nicks-Nunez posterior enlargement in the small aortic annulus: immediate-intermediate results
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2006; 5(6): 749 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
D. Chatel, C. Mica, D. Blanchard, F. Baud, D. Bruere, A. Maudiere, and P. Peycher
Short-term hemodynamic advantages of stentless CryoLife-O'Brien valve over stented bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2006; 5(5): 578 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
N. J. Howell, B. E. Keogh, V. Barnet, R. S. Bonser, T. R. Graham, S. J. Rooney, I. C. Wilson, and D. Pagano
Patient-prosthesis mismatch does not affect survival following aortic valve replacement.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 30(1): 10 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. R. Moon, M. K. Pasque, N. A. Munfakh, S. J. Melby, J. S. Lawton, N. Moazami, J. E. Codd, T. D. Crabtree, H. B. Barner, and R. J. Damiano Jr
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement: Impact of Age and Body Size on Late Survival
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 481 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Doss, J. P. Wood, S. Martens, G. Wimmer-Greinecker, and A. Moritz
Do Pulmonary Autografts Provide Better Outcomes Than Mechanical Valves? A Prospective Randomized Trial
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 80(6): 2194 - 2198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. Bottio, L. Caprili, D. Casarotto, and G. Gerosa
Small aortic annulus: The hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available bileaflet mechanical valves
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2004; 128(3): 457 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. Bottio, G. Rizzoli, G. Thiene, G. Nesseris, D. Casarotto, and G. Gerosa
Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes with the Biocor valve in the aortic position: An 8-year experience
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2004; 127(6): 1616 - 1623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
E. H. Blackstone, D. M. Cosgrove, W.R. E. Jamieson, N. J. Birkmeyer, J. H. Lemmer Jr, D. C. Miller, E. G. Butchart, G. Rizzoli, M. Yacoub, and A. Chai
Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2003; 126(3): 783 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. H. Rahimtoola
Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 19, 2003; 41(6): 893 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis
Stented Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 825 - 856.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
X. Y. Jin and J. R. Pepper
Do stentless valves make a difference?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2002; 22(1): 95 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Gelsomino, G. Morocutti, R. Frassani, P. Da Col, R. Carella, and U. Livi
Usefulness of the cryolife o'brien stentless suprannular aortic valve to prevent prosthesis-patient mismatch in the small aortic root
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 5, 2002; 39(11): 1845 - 1851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. Hanayama, G. T. Christakis, H. R. Mallidi, C. D. Joyner, S. E. Fremes, C. D. Morgan, P. R.R. Mitoff, and B. S. Goldman
Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2002; 73(6): 1822 - 1829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. P. Urbanski
Complete aortic root replacement in patients with small aortic annulus
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2002; 73(3): 725 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Cohen, G. T. Christakis, C. D. Joyner, C. D. Morgan, M. Tamariz, N. Hanayama, H. Mallidi, J.P. Szalai, M. Katic, V. Rao, et al.
Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? A prospective randomized trial
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2002; 73(3): 767 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. D. Milano, M. De Carlo, G. Mecozzi, A. D'Alfonso, G. Scioti, C. Nardi, and U. Bortolotti
Clinical outcome in patients with 19-mm and 21-mm St. Jude aortic prostheses: comparison at long-term follow-up
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 73(1): 37 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Silberman, J. Shaheen, O. Merin, D. Fink, N. Shapira, N. Liviatan-Strauss, and D. Bitran
Exercise hemodynamics of aortic prostheses: comparison between stentless bioprostheses and mechanical valves
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 72(4): 1217 - 1221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
G. Ismeno, A. Renzulli, M. De Feo, A. Della Corte, F. E. Covino, and M. Cotrufo
Standard versus hemodynamic plus 19-mm St Jude Medical aortic valves
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2001; 121(4): 723 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. Z. Bloomstein, I. Gielchinsky, A. D. Bernstein, V. Parsonnet, C. Saunders, R. Karanam, and B. Graves
Aortic valve replacement in geriatric patients: determinants of in-hospital mortality
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 597 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. P. Kappetein, J. Braun, L. H.B. Baur, A. Prat, K. Peels, M. G. Hazekamp, P. H. Schoof, and H. A. Huysmans
Outcome and follow-up of aortic valve replacement with the freestyle stentless bioprosthesis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 601 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. H. Rahimtoola
Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Systolic Gradient : The Good and Bad News
Circulation, April 25, 2000; 101(16): 1892 - 1894.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. M. Connolly, J. K. Oh, H. V. Schaff, V. L. Roger, S. L. Osborn, D. O. Hodge, and A. J. Tajik
Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Transvalvular Gradient and Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction : Result of Aortic Valve Replacement in 52 Patients
Circulation, April 25, 2000; 101(16): 1940 - 1946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. Walther, V. Falk, G. Langebartels, M. Kruger, U. Bernhardt, A. Diegeler, J. Gummert, R. Autschbach, and F. W. Mohr
Prospectively Randomized Evaluation of Stentless Versus Conventional Biological Aortic Valves : Impact on Early Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100(90002): II-6 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. B. Izzat, I. Kadir, B. Reeves, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini
Patient-prosthesis mismatch is negligible with modern small-size aortic valve prostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 68(5): 1657 - 1660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
O. Lund, H. K. Pilegaard, L. B. Ilkjaer, S. L. Nielsen, and H. Arildsen
Performance profile of the Starr-Edwards aortic cloth covered valve, track valve, and silastic ball valve
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 1999; 16(4): 403 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
V. Rao, G. T. Christakis, J. Sever, S. E. Fremes, G. Bhatnagar, G. Cohen, M. A. Borger, L. Abouzahr, and B. S. Goldman
A NOVEL COMPARISON OF STENTLESS VERSUS STENTED VALVES IN THE SMALL AORTIC ROOT
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 1999; 117(3): 431 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
U. Hvass, G. M. Palatianos, R. Frassani, C. Puricelli, and M. O'Brien
MULTICENTER STUDY OF STENTLESS VALVE REPLACEMENT IN THE SMALL AORTIC ROOT
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1999; 117(2): 267 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
R. Vijayanagar, G. Chan, R. Musunuru, N. Sastry, I. Siegman, N. Rattehalli, and M. Cortelli
Aortic Valve Replacement Without Annular Enlargement in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 1998; 6(4): 279 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. Medalion, B. W. Lytle, P. M. McCarthy, R. W. Stewart, K. L. Arheart, J. H. Arnold, F. D. Loop, and D. M. Cosgrove III
Aortic valve replacement for octogenarians: are small valves bad?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1998; 66(3): 699 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. C. Spencer
The Development of Valvular Heart Surgery Over the Past 50 Years (1947-1997): Personal Recollections
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1997; 64(5): 1549 - 1554.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. De Paulis, L. Sommariva, G. M. De Matteis, E. Caprara, F. Tomai, A. P. de Peppo, P. Polisca, C. Bassano, and L. Chiariello
EXTENT AND PATTERN OF REGRESSION OF LEFT VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY IN PATIENTS WITH SMALL SIZE CARBOMEDICS AORTIC VALVES
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 1997; 113(5): 901 - 909.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. T. Christakis and B. S. Goldman
Do Small Aortic Valves Influence Long-Term Survival?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1997; 63(4): 933 - 934.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. Sawant, A. K. Singh, W. C. Feng, A. A. Bert, and F. Rotenberg
Nineteen-Millimeter Aortic St. Jude Medical Heart Valve Prosthesis: Up to Sixteen Years' Follow-up
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1997; 63(4): 964 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. C. Moulijn, H. A. Verheul, E. Dekker, B. J. Amsel, G.-W. He, G. L. Grunkemeier, and A. Starr
Background Mortality and Aortic Valve Replacement in the Elderly
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1997; 63(1): 300 - 301.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. T. Christakis, C. D. Joyner, C. D. Morgan, S. E. Fremes, K. J. Buth, J. Y. Sever, V. Rao, K. P. Panagiotopoulos, P. M. Murphy, and B. S. Goldman
Left Ventricular Mass Regression Early After Aortic Valve Replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1996; 62(4): 1084 - 1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1995 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.