HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Neal D. Kon Stephen Westaby Ravi Pillai Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kon, N. D. Articles by Cordell, A. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kon, N. D. Articles by Cordell, A. R. Related Collections Related Article

Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:857-862
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Comparison of Implantation Techniques Using Freestyle Stentless Porcine Aortic Valve

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and Oxford Heart Centre, Oxford, England

Stentless porcine aortic valves demonstrate superior hemodynamic performance when compared with their stented counterparts. The technical considerations for implanting these valves can be demanding. The Medtronic Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis resembles an allograft, has zero-pressure--fixed leaflets treated with an antimineralization agent, and can be implanted using a variety of techniques. In this study of that valve, total root replacement (TRR) was compared with a partial scallop aortic inclusion technique (PSI). Implantations were performed in 75 patients (49 PSI and 26 TRR). There were no significant differences with respect to age, sex, or incidence of concomitant procedures. Mean aortic cross-clamp times were significantly less in the PSI group than in the TRR group (51.8 +/- 11.7 minutes versus 125.5 +/- 19.7 minutes; p = 0.0001). At discharge, mean systolic gradients seen on color-flow Doppler echocardiography were less in the TRR group than in the PSI group (6.17 +/- 3.66 versus 10.01 +/- 4.83 mm Hg; p = 0.014). Discharge echocardiography revealed trivial valve regurgitation in 8.3% of the TRR group and in 41.7% of the PSI group (p = 0.004). No patient experienced any significant valvular regurgitation on discharge echocardiography. We conclude that early experience with the Medtronic Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis shows excellent short-term function regardless of implantation technique. Shorter cross-clamp times, comparable with those of stented valve procedures, occurred with PSI implantation. We anticipate that effects on long-term durability will be beneficial.

Related Article

DISCUSSION
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1995 59: 857-862. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. E. Dapunt, J. Easo, P. P.F. Holzl, P. Murin, M. Sudkamp, M. Horst, and E. Natour Stentless full root bioprosthesis in surgery for complex aortic valve-ascending aortic disease: a single center experience of over 300 patients Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 554 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A.C. Ennker, A. A. Albert, U. P. Rosendahl, I. C. Ennker, F. Dalladaku, and I. Florath Ten-Year Experience With Stentless Aortic Valves: Full-Root Versus Subcoronary Implantation Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): 445 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Takami, H. Masumoto, and B. Fyfe-Kirschner Late Disruption of a Freestyle Stentless Bioprosthesis Used for Repair of Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysm of Noncoronary Cusp Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 83(6): 2210 - 2213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Nowell, E. Wilton, H. Markus, and M. Jahangiri Antithrombotic therapy following bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 31(4): 578 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Shiono, Y. Watanabe, M. Kawasaki, H. Yokomuro, T. Fujii, and N. Koyama Evaluation of Bioprosthetic Valve for Small Aortic Root in Elderly Patients Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, April 1, 2007; 15(2): 102 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Doty and J. R. Doty Stentless Aortic Valve Replacement: Bioprostheses Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 889 - 898. [Full Text]

				N. D. Kon, R. D. Riley, S. M. Adair, D. W. Kitzman, and A. R. Cordell Eight-year results of aortic root replacement with the freestyle stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2002; 73(6): 1817 - 1821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kirsch, E. Vermes, R. Houel, and D. Loisance The freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis: more about the subcoronary technique Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2001; 19(3): 369 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Riley, J. W. Hammon Jr, S. M. Adair, A. R. Cordell, and N. D. Kon Stentless aortic valve replacement with freestyle or Toronto SPV: an early comparison Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2000; 70(1): 48 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kalangos, P. Trigo-Trindade, D. Vala, A. Panos, and B. Faidutti AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH THE FREESTYLE STENTLESS BIOPROSTHESIS WITH RESPECT TO SPACIAL ORIENTATION OF PATIENT CORONARY OSTIA J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2000; 119(6): 1185 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. L. Nagy, J. Fisher, P. G. Walker, and K. G. Watterson The effect of sizing on the hydrodynamic parameters of the medtronic freestyle valve in vitro Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2000; 69(5): 1408 - 1413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Fries, O. Wendler, H. Schieffer, and H.-J. Schafers Comparative rest and exercise hemodynamics of 23-mm stentless versus 23-mm stented aortic bioprostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2000; 69(3): 817 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Uemura, J. Utoh, M. Hara, Y. Ikuta, and N. Kitamura Transient dysfunction of the freestyle stentless xenograft Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1999; 68(6): 2342 - 2344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. D. Kon, A. R. Cordell, S. M. Adair, J. E. Dobbins, and D. W. Kitzman Aortic root replacement with the freestyle stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1999; 67(6): 1609 - 1615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Mediratta, A. W. Sosnowski, and M. Galiņanes POSTERIOR AORTOVENTRICULAR BLEEDING AFTER SUPRA-ANNULAR STENTLESS AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 1999; 117(5): 1031 - 1032. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Westaby, X. Y. Jin, T. Katsumata, A. Arifi, and P. Braidley Valve replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis: Versatility of theporcine aortic root J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 1998; 116(3): 477 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. H. Krause Jr Technique for Complete Subcoronary Implantation of the Medtronic Freestyle Porcine Bioprosthesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1997; 64(5): 1495 - 1498. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. Bhatnagar, G. T. Christakis, P. M. Murphy, D. Oxorn, and B. S. Goldman Technique for Reconstruction of the Sinotubular Junction Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1997; 63(2): 559 - 560. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. F. Del Rizzo, B. S. Goldman, G. T. Christakis, and T. E. David HEMODYNAMIC BENEFITS OF THE TORONTO STENTLESS VALVE J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 1996; 112(6): 1431 - 1446. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. Westaby, N. Amarasena, V. Long, A. Prothero, G. A. C. Amarasena, A. P. Banning, R. Pillai, and O. Ormerod Time-Related Hemodynamic Changes After Aortic Replacement With the Freestyle Stentless Xenograft Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1995; 60(6): 1633 - 1638. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. B. Izzat, M. Caputo, and G. D. Angelini Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Performance of Stentless Porcine Aortic Valves Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1995; 60(5): 1461 - 1461. [Full Text]