HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Barbour, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Barbour, G.

Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:1881-1884
© 1994 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Articles

The role of outcomes data in health care reform

Quality Management, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia USA

^_* Address reprint requests to Dr Barbour, Quality Management (15), Department of Veterans Affairs Central Office, 810 Vermont Ave NW, Washington, DC 20420.
Doing things the same way over and over, but expecting a different result is one definition of insanity. Richard Coffey

The major driver currently behind the health care reform movement is cost containment. An important mechanism of cost containment will be the transferal of financial risk from third-party payers to care providers. This places the risk for managing the care and the dollars at the site where the care is being delivered. However, by the turn of the century, cost will no longer be the major driver. The value or the performance of the health care plan will be the key issue. Measures of performance and value include both quality of care and patient satisfaction. The Veterans Health Administration defines quality health care as "care that is needed; care that is delivered in a manner that is competent, caring, cost-effective, timely, and at minimal risk to the patient and to the providers; and care which achieves achievable benefits." Patient satisfaction comes from the patient recognizing the customer orientation in us as service renders—as caring for our patients. Health care providers must take charge of setting the measures, defining quality, and seeing to it that we as a profession—as a service profession—conform to that definition.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. C. George and J. J. Popma Reduced Reimbursement for Cardiovascular Services by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Perspective From Interventional Cardiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., September 1, 2009; 2(9): 894 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. A. Ferraris, F. H. Edwards, D. M. Shahian, and S. P. Ferraris Risk Stratification and Comorbidity Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 199 - 246. [Full Text]

				S. A M Nashef and R. J F Baskett Quality Assessment in Cardiac Surgery: Do Not Miss the Boat! Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2004; 12(3): 187 - 189. [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. A. Ferraris and S. P. Ferraris Risk Stratification and Comorbidity Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 187 - 224. [Full Text]