| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:1827-1835
© 1994 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Health Services Research and Development and Department of Medicine, Bruckton/West Roxbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Roxbury USA
b Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts USA
* Address reprint requests to Dr Daley, West Roxbury VAMC, 1400 VFW Pkwy, West Roxbury, MA 02132.
Risk adjustment models for hospitalized patients are most advanced for the assessment of the clinical outcome of cardiac procedures, and for coronary artery bypass grafting in particular. The goal of being able to use outcomes as a credible indicator of quality of care has stimulated the development of several programs that use reliable, valid patient data collected during the surgical episode to adjust outcomes for the severity of illness. Several criteria that are useful in the assessment of risk adjustment methods for outcome and quality-of-care investigations are discussed in detail and five of these programs are compared. The programs have more similarities than differences and identify many of the same patient characteristics predictive of a higher likelihood of mortality in the period immediately after operation. Whether persistent differences in mortality after risk adjustment across institutions or Individual surgeons, or both, may ultimately be attributed to the process and structure of care needs further study and investigation. Similar methods should be applied to other outcomes of importance to patients, their families, and their physicians, such as surgically related morbidity, functional status, quality of life, costs, and patient-reported perceptions of the nontechnical aspects of their care.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. E. Antunes, J. F. de Oliveira, and M. J. Antunes Risk-prediction for postoperative major morbidity in coronary surgery Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, May 1, 2009; 35(5): 760 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Shahian, F. H. Edwards, V. A. Ferraris, C. K. Haan, J. B. Rich, S.-L. T. Normand, E. R. DeLong, S. M. O'Brien, C. M. Shewan, R. S. Dokholyan, et al. Quality Measurement in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Part 1--Conceptual Framework and Measure Selection Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4_Supplement): S3 - S12. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Shahian, T. Silverstein, A. F. Lovett, R. E. Wolf, and S.-L. T. Normand Comparison of Clinical and Administrative Data Sources for Hospital Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Report Cards Circulation, March 27, 2007; 115(12): 1518 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Hellgren and E. Stahle Quality of Life After Heart Valve Surgery With Prolonged Intensive Care Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1693 - 1698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Shahian, E. H. Blackstone, F. H. Edwards, F. L. Grover, G. L. Grunkemeier, D. C. Naftel, S. A.M. Nashef, W. C. Nugent, and E. D. Peterson Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: A Position Article Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1868 - 1877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. E. Tranmer and M. J. E. Parry Enhancing Postoperative Recovery of Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial of an Advanced Practice Nursing Intervention West J Nurs Res, August 1, 2004; 26(5): 515 - 532. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Wynne Variable Definitions: Implications for the Prediction of Pulmonary Complications after Adult Cardiac Surgery European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, April 1, 2004; 3(1): 43 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. A. Ferraris and S. P. Ferraris Risk Stratification and Comorbidity Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 187 - 224. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Pinna-Pintor, M. Bobbio, S. Colangelo, F. Veglia, M. Giammaria, D. cuni, F. Maisano, and O. Alfieri Inaccuracy of four coronary surgery risk-adjusted models to predict mortality in individual patients Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, February 1, 2002; 21(2): 199 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Shahian, S.-L. Normand, D. F. Torchiana, S. M. Lewis, J. O. Pastore, R. E. Kuntz, and P. I. Dreyer Cardiac surgery report cards: comprehensive review and statistical critique Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): 2155 - 2168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Birjiniuk Patient outcomes in the assessment of myocardial injury following cardiac surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): S2208 - S2212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. P. Siegenthaler, K. M. Pisters, K. W. Merriman, J. A. Roth, S. G. Swisher, G. L. Walsh, A. A. Vaporciyan, W. R. Smythe, and J. B. Putnam Jr Preoperative chemotherapy for lung cancer does not increase surgical morbidity Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2001; 71(4): 1105 - 1112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. P. Lippmann and D. M. Shahian Coronary Artery Bypass Risk Prediction Using Neural Networks Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1997; 63(6): 1635 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Soderlind, H. Rutberg, and C. Olin Late Outcome and Quality of Life After Complicated Heart Operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1997; 63(1): 124 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. L. Grover, K. E. Hammermeister, and A. L. W. Shroyer Quality initiatives and the power of the database: What they are and how they run Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1995; 60(5): 1514 - 1521. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. E. Hammermeister, J. Daley, and F. L. Grover Using outcomes data to improve clinical practice: What we have learned Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1994; 58(6): 1809 - 1811. [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |
