HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Izzat, M. Articles by Bryan, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Izzat, M. Articles by Bryan, A. J.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 58, 1486-1489, Copyright © 1994 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Transesophageal echocardiographic measurements of cardiac output in cardiac surgical patients

MBB Izzat, IA Regragui, P Wilde, GD Angelini and AJ Bryan
Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.

Transesophageal echocardiography is becoming increasingly popular as a method of intraoperative monitoring because it can be performed continuously, does not transgress the sterile operative field, and provides data with regard to valve function, ventricular volumes, and contractility. Recently it was suggested that it can be used to measure cardiac output; however, controversy remains regarding its accuracy. Cardiac output was measured simultaneously by transesophageal echocardiography (using a 5-MHz pulse-wave Doppler, single-plane viewing probe) and by the thermodilution method in 21 patients undergoing open heart operations. The cardiac outputs measured by thermodilution correlated poorly (r = 0.45) with the transesophageal values derived from the left ventricular cross-sectional area, and the mean difference was 0.47 +/- 2.17 (standard deviation) L.min-1, giving limits of agreement of from -3.87 to +4.81 L.min-1. Cardiac outputs measured by thermodilution correlated well (r = 0.95) with transesophageal Doppler values derived from pulmonary artery flow velocity, with a mean difference of 0.12 +/- 0.45 L.min-1 and narrow limits of agreement of from -0.78 to +1.02 L.min-1. Based on our findings, transesophageal Doppler echocardiographic determination of cardiac output using pulmonary artery flow measurements can provide accurate hemodynamic data in patients undergoing cardiac operations.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. I. Poelaert and G. Schupfer Hemodynamic Monitoring Utilizing Transesophageal Echocardiography: The Relationships Among Pressure, Flow, and Function Chest, January 1, 2005; 127(1): 379 - 390. [Full Text] [PDF]