HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Robinson, L. A. Articles by Easley, A. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Robinson, L. A. Articles by Easley, A. R.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 57, 1184-1192, Copyright © 1994 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Options in managing the patient with high defibrillation thresholds

LA Robinson, JR Windle and AR Easley
Section of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198-2315.

The desired defibrillation threshold (DFT) obtained during intraoperative testing of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) should be 10 J lower than the maximal energy delivered by the ICD generator. Of the 206 patients undergoing ICD implantation since December 1986, 8 (3.9%) have had initial DFTs with less than the 10-J safety margin using the standard large patch-large patch configuration. Patches were implanted by left thoracotomy in 6 and sternotomy in 1, and 1 had implantation of a transvenous defibrillation lead and subcutaneous patch. Of note, 6 (75%) of the 8 patients with high DFTs had prior open heart operations, half were on a regimen of long-term amiodarone therapy, and the mean left ventricular mass index was quite large but not significantly greater than that of patients with low DFTs. Multiple techniques was tried to improve the DFTs in this group. Satisfactory DFTs were eventually obtained in 7 (88%); the threshold was lowered from a mean of 41.4 +/- 3.8 J to 26.9 +/- 8.8 J (p = 0.002). The most effective techniques were addition of a superior vena cava lead attached by a Y connector to one of the large patch leads in some patients and conversion to a biphasic-waveform generator in 2 others. Adding a third epicardial lead did not lower the DFTs. There were no major postoperative complications or deaths attributable to these supplemental procedures. Using these techniques, satisfactory DFTs were obtained in almost all patients with an ICD.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.R Paisey, T Betts, S Allen, J.M Morgan, and P.R Roberts Evaluation of body weight as a predictive factor for transvenous ventricular defibrillation characteristics Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(1): 21 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]