ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Boineau, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, T. B., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Boineau, J. P.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 57, 588-596, Copyright © 1994 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Should surgeons still be implanting pacemakers?

TB Ferguson Jr, BD Lindsay and JP Boineau
Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Cardiac pacing has undergone major changes in the areas of manpower, technology, and cost over the past 10 years. Arguments have been made to eliminate cardiac surgical involvement in pacing on the basis of these three areas of change: implantations are increasingly performed by nonsurgeons, surgeons have not kept up with the technologic advances in pacing, and consolidation of bradypacing resources is necessary during a time when reimbursement has declined significantly. This study examined two eras of pacing therapy at an institution where pacemaker implantation has always been performed by cardiothoracic surgeons. The purpose of the study was to critically analyze (1) the current role (if any) of cardiothoracic surgeons in delivery of pacemaker therapy and (2) the current results of cardiothoracic surgical involvement in pacemaker implantation. In 1,562 procedures performed between 1986 and 1992, the infection rate was 0.51% and the overall complication rate (both short-term and long-term) was 5.2%. During era 1 (1/1/86 to 6/30/89), 80% of implants were single-chamber and follow-up was incomplete and dependent in many instances on the referring cardiologist/internist. For the implantations performed in the second era (7/1/89 to 12/31/92) as part of an established Pacemaker Service, complete clinical and transtelephonic follow-up services were provided by this coordinated medical-surgical approach. During era 2, 53.9% of implants were dual-chamber (79% during 1992). Total and infectious complication rates remained low in era 2 despite this change in technology.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
L. R. Martinez, R. A. Bryan, C. Apostolidis, A. Morgenstern, A. Casadevall, and E. Dadachova
Antibody-guided alpha radiation effectively damages fungal biofilms.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2006; 50(6): 2132 - 2136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. Ferguson Jr, C. Ferguson, K Crites, and P Crimmins-Reda
THE ADDITIONAL HOSPITAL COSTS GENERATED IN THE MANAGEMENT OF COMPLICATIONS OF PACEMAKER AND DEFIBRILLATOR IMPLANTATIONS
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 1996; 111(4): 742 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1994 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.