ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyle, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Foker, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyle, E. M., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Foker, J. E.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 57, 576-579, Copyright © 1994 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Primary repair of ultra-long-gap esophageal atresia: results without a lengthening procedure

EM Boyle Jr, ED Irwin and JE Foker
Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Ultra-long-gap esophageal atresia, defined as a gap length of 3.5 cm or greater, has proved difficult to repair. When primary repair has been attempted, even with bougienage, circular myotomy, or intraabdominal esophageal mobilization to lessen anastomotic tension, leaks, anastomotic disruptions, and recurrent tracheoesophageal fistulas are frequent. Consequently, interposition grafts are commonly used. For long-term function the intact native esophagus should be preferable to an interposition graft or the consequences of circular myotomy. Therefore, even when an ultra-long gap is present, we have carried out a primary repair using our single-layer technique without myotomies. Since 1979, 8 of 58 infants (14%) with esophageal atresia had gaps ranging from 3.5 to 6 cm. All had a primary repair with follow-up from 1 to 11 years. Despite severe anastomotic tension in all cases, there were no anastomotic leaks, disruptions, recurrent tracheoesophageal fistulas, or deaths. The tension, however, may have led to major gastroesophageal reflux in 5 of 8 patients (62.5%), all treated by a Nissen fundoplication, and a stricture in 4 of 8 infants (50%). Three strictures responded to dilation and one was resected. Now, all children are eating a normal diet for age. In conclusion, this technique has allowed primary repair of ultra-long-gap esophageal atresia. Although the severe tension may contribute to strictures needing dilation and gastroesophageal reflux requiring fundoplication, primary repair resulted in a clinically functional native esophagus.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
P. J. Healey, R. S. Sawin, D. G. Hall, R. T. Schaller, and D. Tapper
Delayed Primary Repair of Esophageal Atresia With Tracheoesophageal Fistula: Is It Worth the Wait?
Arch Surg, May 1, 1998; 133(5): 552 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Y. Tsai, L. Berkery, D. E. Wesson, S. F. Redo, and N. A. Spigland
Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula: Surgical Experience Over Two Decades
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1997; 64(3): 778 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1994 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.