HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): John E. Foker Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boyle, E. M. Articles by Foker, J. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boyle, E. M., Jr Articles by Foker, J. E.

Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:576-579
© 1994 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Articles

Primary repair of ultra-long-gap esophageal atresia: Results without a lengthening procedure

Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota USA

^_* Address reprint requests to Dr Foker, Box 495 UMHC, 420 Delaware StSE, Minneapolis, MN 55455.

Ultra-long-gap esophageal atresia, defined as a gap length of 3.5 cm or greater, has proved difficult to repair. When primary repair has been attempted, even with bougienage, circular myotomy, or intraabdominal esophageal mobilization to lessen anastomotic tension, leaks, anastomotic disruptions, and recurrent tracheoesophageal fistulas are frequent. Consequently, interposition grafts are commonly used. For long-term function the intact native esophagus should be preferable to an interposition graft or the consequences of circular myotomy. Therefore, even when an ultra-long gap is present, we have carried out a primary repair using our single-layer technique without myotomies. Since 1979, 8 of 58 infants (14%) with esophageal atresia had gaps ranging from 3.5 to 6 cm. All had a primary repair with follow-up from 1 to 11 years. Despite severe anastomotic tension in all cases, there were no anastomotic leaks, disruptions, recurrent tracheoesophageal fistulas, or deaths. The tension, however, may have led to major gastroesophageal reflux in 5 of 8 patients (62.5%), all treated by a Nissen fundoplication, and a stricture in 4 of 8 infants (50%). Three strictures responded to dilation and one was resected. Now, all children are eating a normal diet for age. In conclusion, this technique has allowed primary repair of ultra-long-gap esophageal atresia. Although the severe tension may contribute to strictures needing dilation and gastroesophageal reflux requiring fundoplication, primary repair resulted in a clinically functional native esophagus.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. J. Healey, R. S. Sawin, D. G. Hall, R. T. Schaller, and D. Tapper Delayed Primary Repair of Esophageal Atresia With Tracheoesophageal Fistula: Is It Worth the Wait? Arch Surg, May 1, 1998; 133(5): 552 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Y. Tsai, L. Berkery, D. E. Wesson, S. F. Redo, and N. A. Spigland Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula: Surgical Experience Over Two Decades Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1997; 64(3): 778 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. G. Coran Ultra-long-gap esophageal atresia: How long is long? Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1994; 57(3): 528 - 529. [PDF]