HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fullerton, D. A. Articles by Grover, F. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fullerton, D. A. Articles by Grover, F. L.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 56, 1263-1266, Copyright © 1993 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Hemodynamic advantage of left atrial epinephrine administration after cardiac operations

DA Fullerton, JA St. Cyr, JD Albert and FL Grover
Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262.

Cardiac surgical patients frequently require catecholamines, typically administered via the central venous circulation. Potential disadvantages of this route of administration include catecholamine metabolism by the pulmonary vascular bed before gaining access to the heart and pulmonary vasoconstriction producing increased pulmonary vascular resistance. We therefore prospectively compared administration of epinephrine via the left atrium versus central venous administration of epinephrine with particular interest in cardiac output, mean pulmonary artery pressure, and pulmonary vascular resistance. Fifteen consecutive aortocoronary bypass patients were studied after cardiopulmonary bypass. Epinephrine (mean dose, 0.07 +/- 0.02 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) was administered via the central venous route, then via the left atrium, then via the central venous route again. Hemodynamic data were collected 10 minutes after changing the route of administration. Left atrial administration of epinephrine produced a 35% greater cardiac output, 25% lower pulmonary artery pressure, and 32% lower pulmonary vascular resistance when compared with central venous administration (all significant; p < 0.05). Left atrial epinephrine administration may offer hemodynamic advantage in cardiac surgical patients in whom central venous administration does not produce an adequate cardiac output or in patients with pulmonary hypertension to avoid any further increase in pulmonary vascular resistance.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Aral, M. Oguz, H. Ozberrak, Y. Batislam, T. Corapcioglu, N. T. Eren, R. Tasoz, and H. Akalin Hemodynamic Advantages of Left Atrial Epinephrine Administration in Open Heart Operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1997; 64(4): 1046 - 1049. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. A. Fullerton, M. B. Mitchell, D. N. Jones, A. Maki, and R. C. McIntyre Jr. PULMONARY VASOMOTOR DYSFUNCTION IS PRODUCED WITH CHRONICALLY HIGH PULMONARY BLOOD FLOW J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1996; 111(1): 190 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text]