HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Miller, J. I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miller, J. I., Jr

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 56, 769-771, Copyright © 1993 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Limited resection of bronchogenic carcinoma in the patient with impaired pulmonary function

JI Miller Jr
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory Clinic, Atlanta, Georgia 30308.

Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. In some patients with marked impairment of pulmonary function, cardiac disease, or other medical conditions, the surgeon is faced with performing either a limited resection or carrying out nonoperative therapy. Impaired pulmonary functions are defined as a maximum breathing capacity (MBC) of 35% to 40% of predicted; forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of less than 1 L; and a forced expiratory volume 25%-75% (FEV25-75) of less than 0.6 L. When MBC values are less than 35% of predicted; the FEV1 is less than 0.6 L; and the FEV25-75 is less than 0.6 L, elective resection is contraindicated. Useful criteria for indicating an elective limited resection include the following: (1) T1 lesion, (2) peripheral location, (3) margins easily encompassed by resection, and (4) no gross lymph node involvement. In a study of 67 patients, there was 1 postoperative death, with less than an 80% 2-year survival and a 31% 5-year survival. The role of video-assisted thoracoscopy in the management of primary lung cancer remains to be defined. When the high-risk patient can be operated on with attendant low morbidity and mortality, I believe, at the current time, a video-assisted thoracic resection for primary lung cancer is not the best option, as the patient will be offered a compromised operation, and I suspect follow-up studies will prove this correct.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Yoshida, K. Nagai, T. Yokose, M. Nishimura, R. Kakinuma, H. Ohmatsu, and Y. Nishiwaki Limited resection trial for pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules: Fifty-case experience J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2005; 129(5): 991 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Deslauriers Current surgical treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer 2001 Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(35_suppl): 61S - 70s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Suzuki, K. Nagai, J. Yoshida, M. Nishimura, and Y. Nishiwaki Predictors of lymph node and intrapulmonary metastasis in clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2001; 72(2): 352 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Aoki, Y. Yamato, M. Tsuchida, T. Watanabe, J.-i. Hayashi, and T. Hirono Pulmonary complications after surgical treatment of lung cancer in octogenarians Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2000; 18(6): 662 - 665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Deslauriers and J. Gregoire Surgical Therapy of Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Chest, April 1, 2000; 117 (2009): 104S - 109S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Bernard Resection of Pulmonary Nodules Using Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1996; 61(1): 202 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text]